Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #9751 20130403 01:54:59
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaNo, doing those dishes. All the dishes and glasses and everything else was in the sink. I got sick of looking at that. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9752 20130403 02:10:29
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaOh, that. Yes, it takes me an hour to do the dishes sometimes... only because I am thorough. #9753 20130403 02:38:26
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaTakes me long because I let them pile up. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9754 20130403 02:55:00#9755 20130403 03:05:33
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI hate housework... In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9756 20130403 03:09:20
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI haven't been able to find one. So I tried looking for a Laurent series command or something (then I could just look for the 1/(z  c) power), but I could not find that either... #9757 20130403 03:12:13
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaOkay, I was just wondering. Perhaps taylor can do it? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9758 20130403 03:14:21
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI tried that too but I cannot get it to give me negative powers (well it gives me something else that isn't making sense to me)... #9759 20130403 03:14:59
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaWhat one did you try? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9760 20130403 03:20:49
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 Formulataylor(exp(x), x, 5, 5); #9761 20130403 03:26:13
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThat is correct according to Mathematica. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9762 20130403 03:34:18#9763 20130403 03:39:36
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThat expansion is correct. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9764 20130403 03:51:42
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThat is interesting, so sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. #9765 20130403 03:56:12
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaWhen did it not? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9766 20130403 03:58:48
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHmm, never mind, I was confused why it was not working for e^x  it seems e^x does not have a Laurent series? #9767 20130403 04:01:18
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9768 20130403 04:54:36
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI feel like I have a powerful tool (Maxima) in an idiot's hands (me). #9769 20130403 04:57:06
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI have been working with many CAS since 1998. I have only scratched the surface. Welcome to the New Math! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9770 20130403 04:59:01
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI thought you said you knew 16 programming languages or something... #9771 20130403 05:01:51
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaAt one time I knew 10 or 12. The last being C++ which was my favorite. Then we discovered Mupad lite. I could not believe my eyes. Everything we were trying to write our program to do they had already done and then some. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9772 20130403 05:26:54
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHmm. So, is there any use in knowing lots of programming languages these days? Or can a package likely do all of that for you? #9773 20130403 05:30:51
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaA package can do all of that and more. Combining mathematics and programming produces a powerful weapon. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9774 20130403 05:37:50
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI've heard of that one. Never downloaded it though, I hate geometry... #9775 20130403 05:41:23
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI did too, until geogebra made it fun. What you hate is how they teach it. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 