Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #6351 20121103 01:40:57
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHa! The biggest change in a man's life (as depicted in "All the world's a stage") is puberty. However, I have managed to surpress sit for the bigger and better things in life such as education. I have discovered a truly marvellous signature, which this margin is too narrow to contain. Fermat Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. Archimedes Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them.  Neumann #6352 20121103 01:43:33
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaSo has he. He is very well versed and well trained. He just is in a difficult time. One that he will struggle through and then conquer. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6353 20121103 01:45:12
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaDivide and conquer! But I'd much rather not care about attractions. Covalent bonding instead of ionic. Or rather...Polar bonding. I have discovered a truly marvellous signature, which this margin is too narrow to contain. Fermat Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. Archimedes Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them.  Neumann #6354 20121103 01:48:00
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYou might very soon. I talk with someone about your age and he is in love. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6355 20121103 01:49:15
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaAs I said, I do not care about anything is this world other then education, academics and bioimmortality. I have discovered a truly marvellous signature, which this margin is too narrow to contain. Fermat Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. Archimedes Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them.  Neumann #6356 20121103 01:51:13
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYou see how easy it is to start chatting? But we have lost zetafunc; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6357 20121103 02:13:40
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI think I will not ask her out. She said "I'm not really sure, just school and work and stuff, nothing special xxxx". I can't see any sign of interest. I think I ought to drop it. #6358 20121103 02:16:42
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaWell, believe it or not that is slightly better than before. If she had hard plans that does not leave you any room to maneuver. But if her plans are not fixed then you can possibly ask. The "nothing special" is a sign of boredom and maybe you can alleviate that. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6359 20121103 02:22:41
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaSo why didn't she ask "why"? If she was interested, she'd have asked it as a comeon, but she didn't. Either she is not interested or oblivious to my intentions... #6360 20121103 02:31:52
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaCould be oblivious, that is possible. Hard to detect emotions in a text message. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6361 20121103 02:37:42
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaWhy am I going after girls that show no interest at all? I cannot get anything from R. #6362 20121103 02:40:41
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYou will not know that for sure unless she has failed the three time test. Or acts like F and C did after one time. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6363 20121103 02:49:46
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaBut it is getting boring just doing this same thing over and over and always getting the same result. It is the same story, yet again. #6364 20121103 03:27:26
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaBeing oblivious is a passionate emotion. I do think you should ask R. I have discovered a truly marvellous signature, which this margin is too narrow to contain. Fermat Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. Archimedes Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them.  Neumann #6365 20121103 08:28:16
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6366 20121103 08:34:28
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaOkay, I will go back to the drawing board. #6367 20121103 08:47:01
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaNothing wrong with that. That may develop into a deeper relationship or it may just happen and end. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6368 20121103 08:54:16
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaWell, I do not know who to make my primary target. R, or Katie? It is hard to tell which is the better candidate. #6369 20121103 08:56:23
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThat is difficult to say based on the information you have. Why not wait a little bit longer? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6370 20121103 08:58:04
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHow much longer? With Katie I am running out of time. I have until 8th December at the most, possibly 24th November. That is only three weeks away. #6371 20121103 09:05:09
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThen you will have to ask her for a date. Also you need to get a more lasting way of contacting her. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6372 20121103 09:08:56
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI'll ask her for her number in my next email. #6373 20121103 09:13:11
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYes, also you know I always recommend finding out early whether or not they are interested. That saves so much grief later on. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6374 20121103 09:14:06#6375 20121103 09:21:28
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaBy asking them for a date as soon as is possible. They say yes, great. They say no, great. The date does not have to be elaborate, just a let's get something to eat or let's do this. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 