You are not logged in.
#26 2006-09-17 08:53:27
- Dross
- Power Member
Offline
Re: Battleship on the number line
mathsyperson wrote:
But surely...
Ricky wrote:
Now, let's make things interesting:
Would such a solution work on the rational line? What about the real line?
Bonus points if you name the property of these numbers which gives the solution.
Indeed well spotted 
Bad speling makes me [sic]
#27 2006-09-17 09:42:27
- Ricky
- Moderator
Offline
Re: Battleship on the number line
Edit:
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
#28 2006-09-18 03:55:43
- mathsyperson
- Moderator
Offline
Re: Battleship on the number line
Ah, so by going at a speed of π mph it can evade our bombs forever. Pesky battleship.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
#29 2006-09-18 10:53:01
- Ricky
- Moderator
Offline
Re: Battleship on the number line
Not exactly, mathsyperson. It's not the fact that a number can't be wrote as a/b which makes it impossible to tell. It's the number of numbers that can't be written as a/b which does.
Does that make sense? In a sense, irrational numbers have a "higher infinity" than rationals. There are more of them, in a sense, even though there are both an infinite amount of rationals and irrationals.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
#30 2006-09-18 11:17:36
- mathsyperson
- Moderator
Offline
Re: Battleship on the number line
Yes, I get you.
Edit: That should probably be hidden or something.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.