Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #26 20131213 09:17:58
Re: quantum nos.Most people tend to believe a person should stick by their field of study and that's usually the case. Occasionally you get a hobbyist. I have discovered a truly marvellous signature, which this margin is too narrow to contain. Fermat Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. Archimedes Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them.  Neumann #27 20131213 09:33:34
Re: quantum nos.It's not as rare as some might think. I know quite an amount people who are interested in fields besides their own. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #28 20131215 21:33:13
Re: quantum nos.bio and maths are contradictory. friendship is tan 90°. #29 20131215 22:01:22
Re: quantum nos.That is not true either. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #30 20131215 22:23:31
Re: quantum nos.I would have to agree that to a certain extent they are. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #31 20131215 22:51:24
Re: quantum nos.They are what? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #32 20131215 23:04:29
Re: quantum nos.At odds with each other, particularly now. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #33 20131217 07:56:13
Re: quantum nos.Woah! Are you serious? We use quite a bit of math for biology already, and I presume it will be even more as I get into the graduatelevel courses. I have discovered a truly marvellous signature, which this margin is too narrow to contain. Fermat Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world. Archimedes Young man, in mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them.  Neumann #34 20131217 11:41:02
Re: quantum nos.There is a singular point that someone else and I were discussing a while back which shows what I mean. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 