Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,843

If it was tomorrow here now, then maybe then.

"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,392

Well, it is tomorrow for you.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,843

Well, I woke up this morning (waaaay too early) and sure enough, it's tomorrow now (although it still feels like yesterday).

But the possibility of petrichor being the source of my affluence is definitely out because we're in the grip of quite a cold start to winter here, and on average this month it has rained every other day.

Back to bed...

"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,392

Maybe it's chlorophyll, then?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,843

That's most unlikely (see here.) And if chlorophyll instead of sugar had been put into my tea I would've noticed (which I didn't).

"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,392

Hi phro

I really hope you are no longer affluenced.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,843

My affluence is long gone, thanks (*spent*, one might also say)...'twas just a momentary hiccup.

*hiccup*: c.f. *hiccough*...

OED:

Hickop,hiccup, appears, from its date, to be a variation of the earlierhickock,hicket.Hiccoughwas a later spelling, apparently under the erroneous impression that the second syllable wascough, which has not affected the received pronunciation, and ought to be abandoned as a mere error.

Chambers:

The spelling

hiccoughis due to an earlier confusion withcough.

Merriam-Webster:

hiccoughby folk etymology (inluence ofcough).

Fowler's:

The spelling

-oughis a perversion of popular etymology, and 'should be abandoned as a mere error'OED.

Also, re *hiccuping*, *hiccuped*, the single *p* generally is preferred (c.f. *cupping*, *supped*). Both options are valid.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,392

So, it was just a commentary mishap. That's good.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**a solver****Member**- Registered: 2014-06-01
- Posts: 1

Answer=> number of children be n

They can patronize 3 stalls.

553=13

552=12

333=9

335=11

334=10

223=7

224=8

All the amounts are different and are not 14 and the sum is also 70

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,589

Hi;

Looking it says collectively they can only patronize 3 stalls, your solution is then invalid because you have them patronizing 4 stalls, 5,4,3, and 2.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

**Online**

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,519

Just to let you know, this is from My Best Puzzles in Mathematics by Hubert Phillips.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,589

Hi;

I did not know that but I recommend working on the problem.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

**Online**

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,843

Hi;

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,589

There are no solutions as the problem is worded. The book solutions is also wrong.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

**Online**

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,843

Yes, that's how I see it too.

What do you think of my wording change suggestion in my last post?

Gotta vanish for a bit...

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,589

That is correct, the wording given in the book means 2 stalls.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

**Online**

**phrontister****Real Member**- From: The Land of Tomorrow
- Registered: 2009-07-12
- Posts: 3,843

It would be nice if the OP could note his first post to make people aware of the flaw and the fix before they embarked on trying to solve the puzzle.

*Last edited by phrontister (2014-06-03 04:34:21)*

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,589

I do not think he ever came back in here.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

**Online**

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,519

How about [edit by administrator]?

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,589

That would be a problem?!

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

**Online**

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,519

Why?

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,589

That is the way it is worded in the book.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

**Online**

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,519

phrontister wrote:

It would be nice if the OP could note his first post to make people aware of the flaw and the fix before they embarked on trying to solve the puzzle.

Do that.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,589

Here, I am forced to disagree with my cousin phrontister. It is often good practice to work on problems that have no solution. One of my biggest complaints about my so called education was how my instructors slyly convinced me that

1) All problems have a solution. After all the textbooks are loaded with them. They never showed me one that did not.

2) All problems have nice neat answers like 1,2,3,π, √ 2, √ 3, 1 / 2, 1 / 3 or linear combinations of them.

In the real world not only does not every problem have a solution, lots of times you do not even no whether it does or it does not.

But I will make the change as a warning.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

**Online**

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,519

Counterarguments (even though I wholeheartedly dislike the education system):

1) That is usually only for high school level. At university, we are given several open-ended or unanswerable problems (usually just to show our effort or to discuss it)

2) Once again, that is usually only for high school level. At university, while most of the problems are proofs and the like, the computation problems are usually not in such a simple form.

Offline