Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. Pages: 1 2 #26 20130221 07:03:25
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceWhere does what come from? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #27 20130221 07:03:53
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceHmmmm, the recurrence of course. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #28 20130221 07:04:59
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceI found it using some simple casework. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #29 20130221 07:12:55
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceCasework is never simple and you must always be thinking of the form of your solution. Most math types are notorioulsy bad problem solvers. Just take a look at all those equations that they think are beautiful and are not worth a dime computationally. Last edited by bobbym (20130221 07:15:40) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #30 20130221 07:18:43
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceI hope it doesn't. I don't have much time. We have some tests next week. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #31 20130221 07:24:34
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequence
It is not going to be easy to solve that recurrence. Last edited by bobbym (20130221 09:21:28) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #32 20130221 10:11:47
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceI think a multivariate GF can be found for A(n,k) from the recurrence. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #33 20130221 11:39:37
Re: Combinations 6 of 49 without the results with numbers in sequenceYou will have to do it by hand but why would you? Why do all that work when you do not even know whether it works or not. Last edited by bobbym (20130222 02:48:55) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. Pages: 1 2 