Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-11-24 13:47:13
Newton FractalWill anyone expain me the basic principle behind the generation of Newton Fractals? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #2 2012-11-24 16:17:00
Re: Newton FractalHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2012-11-24 17:11:31
Re: Newton FractalThey? Who are they? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #4 2012-11-24 17:18:34
Re: Newton FractalGood question. Is there some function being iterated? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #5 2012-11-24 17:24:00
Re: Newton FractalActually, this is not something I am being taught at school. 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #6 2012-11-24 17:30:33
Re: Newton FractalHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2012-11-24 17:33:53
Re: Newton FractalNo! What's the name of the book? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #8 2012-11-24 17:36:50
Re: Newton Fractal"Chaos Making a New Science" by James Gleick In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #9 2012-11-24 18:36:37
Re: Newton FractalWhat is the basic principle behind generation of fractals? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #10 2012-11-24 18:39:46
Re: Newton FractalThe instability of Newton's iteration is the main thing! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #11 2012-11-24 18:45:01
Re: Newton FractalWhats "instable" about it? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #12 2012-11-24 18:50:22
Re: Newton FractalWe would have to go over it to really understand that. But I can say that everyone is taught to use it as model of efficiency. Oh, the way it zooms in on the roots of the canned problems that are given it in books. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #13 2012-11-24 20:08:04
Re: Newton FractalChaos is nice! 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #14 2012-11-24 20:08:59
Re: Newton FractalNope! Chaos is a big mess. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #15 2012-11-24 20:16:29
Re: Newton FractalWhy? Don't you enjoy randomness? 'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.' 'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it' 'The whole person changes, why can't a habit?' -65 #16 2012-11-24 20:30:17
Re: Newton FractalI am a numerical analyst. I consider that nothing but round off error, algorithm error. We try to eliminate it and Chaoticians are trying to show it, highlight it. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #17 2012-11-24 22:02:52
Re: Newton FractalHi Bobby,
Yes, that's what happens with your towers problem if I use Newton's Method. Code: PROMPT "Enter approx. x (>33.886745 and <39.999999)";x$
x=VAL(x$)
[loop]
a=1/SQR(2500-x^2)+1/SQR(1600-x^2)-1/10
IF ABS(a-z)<0.000000001 THEN PRINT "15-digit approximation of x: ";USING("##.#############",x):END
z=a
b=x/(2500-x^2)^(3/2)+x/(1600-x^2)^(3/2)
x=x-a/b
GOTO [loop]
Output (for input between 33.886745 and 39.999999):
"15-digit approximation of x: 37.3550853341325"Last edited by phrontister (2012-11-25 00:42:04) "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #18 2012-11-24 22:06:24
Re: Newton FractalHi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #19 2012-11-24 23:05:21
Re: Newton FractalHi Bobby,
"The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #20 2012-11-24 23:16:17
Re: Newton FractalRemember a while back with the loop that counted down from 1 to 0 by .1? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #21 2012-11-24 23:33:49
Re: Newton FractalHmmmm......thinking........still thinking.........and.......nope! "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #22 2012-11-24 23:40:38
Re: Newton FractalThe comparison of two floating point numbers for equality is always dangerous. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #23 2012-11-25 00:03:25
Re: Newton FractalAh...yes. I remember that now. *slaps forehead* "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #24 2012-11-25 00:05:08
Re: Newton FractalMaybe a FOR/NEXT loop? "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #25 2012-11-25 00:29:09
Re: Newton FractalHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |