Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#126 2012-12-28 09:24:22
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Need an I to figure this out.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#127 2012-12-28 09:46:00
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
_ e _ _ _ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ r i _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#128 2012-12-28 09:50:01
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an O?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#129 2012-12-28 11:03:53
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
_ e _ o o_ _ _ e _ _ _ _ r i _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#130 2012-12-28 11:06:05
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
An F?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#131 2012-12-28 11:09:45
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
_ e _ o of _ _ e _ _ _ _ r i _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#132 2012-12-28 11:10:58
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
N?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#133 2012-12-28 11:15:33
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Zeno of Alexandria
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#134 2012-12-28 12:18:43
#135 2012-12-29 06:18:43
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Are you sure?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#136 2012-12-31 05:04:57
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
hero,bobbym.
_ _ - _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#137 2012-12-31 05:15:36
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Yes, I forgot about him! You are correct! Very good puzzle.
Give me a T!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#138 2012-12-31 05:18:05
#139 2012-12-31 05:22:20
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Gimme an S, and put it in the puzzle.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#140 2012-12-31 07:17:15
#141 2012-12-31 07:21:21
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Do we have an E?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#142 2013-01-01 03:38:11
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
no...cool avatatr
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#143 2013-01-01 03:43:42
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an R?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#144 2013-01-01 03:52:50
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
nope.
Hint:Wi- _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#145 2013-01-01 04:11:16
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Wi-Fi
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#146 2013-01-01 07:29:56
#147 2013-01-01 10:30:07
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Let me have a big S!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#148 2013-01-01 11:32:11
#149 2013-01-01 11:33:31
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Better be a T in there somewhere.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#150 2013-01-01 11:38:45
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
no...Hint-go for vowels..
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.