Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #326 2013-01-21 08:52:56
Re: Hangman 1How about a T? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #327 2013-01-22 00:38:14#328 2013-01-22 00:48:31
Re: Hangman 1An S please? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #329 2013-01-22 01:03:58#330 2013-01-22 09:32:48
Re: Hangman 1Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #331 2013-01-22 12:04:35
Re: Hangman 1_ e _ _ o s t Last edited by mathgogocart (2013-01-22 12:04:46) woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #332 2013-01-22 12:10:10
Re: Hangman 1Is there a P? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #333 2013-01-22 12:11:58#334 2013-01-22 12:14:24
Re: Hangman 1bed post? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #335 2013-01-22 12:26:23#336 2013-01-22 12:29:28
Re: Hangman 1Is there a D? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #337 2013-01-22 12:41:56#338 2013-01-22 20:50:11
Re: Hangman 1New Post? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #339 2013-01-23 01:43:56
Re: Hangman 1Try this one: - n872yt3r Math Is Fun Rocks! By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you! #340 2013-01-23 11:54:05
Re: Hangman 1n8,I make them.Not You. woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #341 2013-01-23 12:06:31
Re: Hangman 1Is it I see? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #342 2013-01-23 12:54:13#343 2013-01-23 12:59:21
Re: Hangman 1Give me an A then. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #344 2013-01-23 22:49:08
Re: Hangman 1Aww... I just wanted to join in... - n872yt3r Math Is Fun Rocks! By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you! #345 2013-01-24 11:42:32#346 2013-01-24 11:46:52
Re: Hangman 1How about an N? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #347 2013-01-24 12:45:41#348 2013-01-24 12:47:25
Re: Hangman 1Is it I can? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #349 2013-01-25 09:59:57#350 2013-01-25 10:46:49
Re: Hangman 1Is there an R in there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |