Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,683

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

**Online**

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,401

Sorry,the LaTeX didn't show,so I didn't see your response earlier. It is quite a large number comparing to 1. It is I think around (((3!)!)!)! times greater than 1.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**circlemaker****Member**- Registered: 2011-04-03
- Posts: 20

The biggest number is outside of our awareness. I would say it's the "awareness barrier" itself, or at least in the middle of it (if it could be measured).

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,401

Hi circlemaker

The point of this thread is not finding the biggest numbere there is, which you may know, doesn't exist.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,683

Have you heard of transfinite numbers or mathematics?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

**Online**

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,401

Of course. But we cannot calculate those numbers in a billion of year let alone half a year or a year.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,683

I do not want to spoil your thread with cross talk but they can be computed. See the lecture by Doron Zeilberger. There is a largest number!

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 84,683

Hi;

anonimnystefy wrote:

The point of this thread is not finding the biggest numbere there is

Correct! I will moderate to keep it on track from here.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

**Online**

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

60^60^67^890

Hey.

Offline

**noelevans****Member**- Registered: 2012-07-20
- Posts: 236

So let's see if we can post a bigger one; XXXX

XXXX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XXXXXX

XXXXXX

Wow! That's a BIG one!

Could LaTex himself even post as BIG a one?

Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).

LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

Thats not a number..... 900!*900!

Hey.

Offline

**noelevans****Member**- Registered: 2012-07-20
- Posts: 236

Hi!

Of course 1 is a number. Aren't most people looking out for #1? That's the most mathematics

that many people want to get involved with. But then again maybe they just haven't found it yet

so they don't think it exists!

Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).

LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008*100000000000000000000000000000000

Hey.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,401

Hi noelevans

There are bigger numbers than that in here.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

123!*1528100000000010010101

Hey.

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Juliania
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 2,842
- Website

9.9999999999999999999999999999e+99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

"Double the fun, double the thrill, double the coolness" - Julianthewiki

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

9000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000!*8907987876764555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555.

Hey.

Offline

**noelevans****Member**- Registered: 2012-07-20
- Posts: 236

(3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)^(3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

where 3!! means (3!)!, 3!!! means ((3!)!)! etc.

Note that (2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)^(2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) = 4 so

there is a bit of a leap from using 2 to using 3 in these expressions.

Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).

LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

1000000000000000000000!*12812265731127312371263127370123612381297312803671287126087211897238712731

Hey.

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Juliania
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 2,842
- Website

Graham's number

"Double the fun, double the thrill, double the coolness" - Julianthewiki

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,401

Let's do my old trick.

, where G is the Graham's number.Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

Gramhams Number+666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666667777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777

Hey.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,401

Hi mathgogocart

That is not large enough.

And what is that Gramham number?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Juliania
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 2,842
- Website

Maybe misspelling.

"Double the fun, double the thrill, double the coolness" - Julianthewiki

Offline

**Dets65****Member**- Registered: 2013-05-15
- Posts: 7

Are we allowed to use exponents and power?

Offline