Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #27 20140101 03:42:31
Re: Normal Probability IntegrationHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #29 20140101 21:57:32
Re: Normal Probability IntegrationThe integral of the Normal distribution yields the error function. The error function is not an elementary function. In other words the integral does not have a closed form.
I do not think so and neither does mathematica or maple. I am willing to look at your answer. Please provide your answer. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #31 20140101 23:04:33
Re: Normal Probability IntegrationHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #33 20140101 23:57:56
Re: Normal Probability IntegrationDoesn't that have two parameters not one? That is why I asked. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #35 20140102 00:10:48
Re: Normal Probability IntegrationThat is usually given a number, example Normsdist(2). I have no idea what it means when a function is put in there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 