Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#26 2012-04-29 22:10:51
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
Yes, that is going to be a problem.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#27 2012-04-29 22:15:01
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
Maybe we can use something like adjoint?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#28 2012-04-29 22:20:32
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
I forget that one every once in a while. Like a permanent but aren't they hard to compute?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#29 2012-04-29 22:25:17
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
Whoops that is not what I meant. I have a little problem with tachnical matrix terms.
Couldn't we just add another column at each iteration?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#30 2012-04-29 22:30:18
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
It is getting too unwieldy. If we needed the 1000th level that matrix would be huge.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#31 2012-04-29 22:32:25
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
Well there is no other way to represent it all.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#32 2012-04-30 05:27:05
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
Not that I know of right now.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#33 2012-04-30 05:30:05
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
I meant with a matrix.
Here's another topic:"Do you know any uses of exponental GFs in math problems? Show example."
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#34 2012-04-30 05:32:02
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
Have you seen the problems gAr and I first worked on?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#35 2012-04-30 05:34:25
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
No. I wasn't around at the time. Can you send me a link of one of those problems?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#36 2012-04-30 05:36:38
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
How about you work on one I give you and see if you can solve it?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#37 2012-04-30 05:40:36
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
Sure! I love new problems!
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#38 2012-04-30 05:53:38
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
How many arrangements of 6 letters can be made from numismatics?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#39 2012-04-30 05:55:11
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
I presume you mean the word.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#40 2012-04-30 06:04:45
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
Yes, they are always structured liked that. Numismatics how many arrangements of 6 letters?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#41 2012-04-30 06:05:46
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
What do you mean by arrangement? Can I use double letters twice?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#42 2012-04-30 06:10:53
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
Yes, only the amounts you have there. Here is a 6 letter word MMIISS
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#43 2012-04-30 06:11:24
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
Is it 11!/8 ?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#44 2012-04-30 06:16:19
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
No, that number is too big.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#45 2012-04-30 06:22:54
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
This problem is harder than I originally thought.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#46 2012-04-30 06:24:22
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
That is an easy one.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#47 2012-04-30 06:26:56
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
I don't know how to solve it.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#48 2012-04-30 06:33:39
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#49 2012-04-30 06:40:18
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
So that's the GF! I couldn't think of a way to get that.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#50 2012-04-30 06:41:23
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Generating Functions
Then try another one! 8 letter words from Mississippi.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.