Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #176 20120412 07:03:55#177 20120412 07:05:28
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Do you know how to use it? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #178 20120412 07:10:00
Re: PSLQ and LLL?I do not. I have never used it. You are going top use it for latexing? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #179 20120412 07:11:39
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Thought I could.Maybe to help make docs with LaTeX. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #180 20120412 07:13:36
Re: PSLQ and LLL?You need to make documents with latex? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #181 20120412 07:17:55
Re: PSLQ and LLL?I mat need to.My prof gave me some problems to work on,and because I didn't have a TeX editor,I couldn't send him my work in LaTeX form. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #182 20120412 07:22:41
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Okay, I am going to take a little break. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #183 20120412 07:25:15
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!! The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #184 20120412 08:13:31#185 20120412 18:21:13
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Hi bobbm The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #186 20120412 18:29:54#187 20120412 18:41:00
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Ask you what? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #188 20120412 21:22:22
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Hi bobbym The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #189 20120412 21:26:46
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Try out one of our examples. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #190 20120412 21:27:33
Re: PSLQ and LLL?How do I enter it? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #191 20120412 21:30:55#192 20120412 21:36:17
Re: PSLQ and LLL?It gives out an error.First it gives an error about the brackets,which I then change from normal () to square [].But now it gives an error about the Lattice Reduce Function. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #193 20120412 21:37:07
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Please let me see the error. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #194 20120412 21:38:57
Re: PSLQ and LLL?LatticeReduce::latm : Matrix contains an entry that is not rational. >> The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #195 20120412 21:43:18
Re: PSLQ and LLL?How do you have pi entered in the first parameter? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #196 20120412 21:45:10
Re: PSLQ and LLL?as pi.Here is my input: The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #197 20120412 21:46:23
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Use a capital P or the escape character. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #198 20120412 21:48:22
Re: PSLQ and LLL?It works.Here's the output matrix: Code:{{24, 0, 0, 120, 0, 140, 0, 15, 0}, {1020, 430, 77, 188, 802, 515, 743, 339, 202}, {367, 461, 955, 317, 400, 72, 603, 923, 229}, {40, 509, 464, 705, 1310, 805, 76, 647, 229}, {1320, 100, 177, 585, 1344, 742, 188, 50, 8}, {436, 491, 1733, 347, 118, 380, 282, 505, 200}, {419, 62, 756, 270, 1352, 97, 1105, 1090, 248}, {222, 295, 774, 878, 429, 788, 669, 966, 355}, {19, 1712, 637, 920, 43, 34, 34, 628, 199}} The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #199 20120412 21:49:16
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Hi; Code:pslq[l_,dig_]:=Module[{a}, a=IdentityMatrix[Length[l]]; a=Append[a,10^dig*N[l,dig]]; a=Transpose[a]; a=Rationalize[a,10^dig]; a=LatticeReduce[a]; Take[a,All,{1,Length[l]}]; a]; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #200 20120412 21:51:38
Re: PSLQ and LLL?Right click the output and copy as latex you will get this: In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 