Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#176 2012-04-12 07:03:55
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
No, I do not use Mik Tex.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#177 2012-04-12 07:05:28
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Do you know how to use it?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#178 2012-04-12 07:10:00
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
I do not. I have never used it. You are going top use it for latexing?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#179 2012-04-12 07:11:39
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Thought I could.Maybe to help make docs with LaTeX.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#180 2012-04-12 07:13:36
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
You need to make documents with latex?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#181 2012-04-12 07:17:55
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
I mat need to.My prof gave me some problems to work on,and because I didn't have a TeX editor,I couldn't send him my work in LaTeX form.
780MB 16 mins left 
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#182 2012-04-12 07:22:41
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Okay, I am going to take a little break.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#183 2012-04-12 07:25:15
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#184 2012-04-12 08:13:31
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
What is happening now?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#185 2012-04-12 18:21:13
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Hi bobbm
That was the desperation because you were leaving.
Chances are I wont be able to do anything in Mathematica,but I will have to check.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#186 2012-04-12 18:29:54
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
You just have to ask me.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#187 2012-04-12 18:41:00
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Ask you what?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#188 2012-04-12 21:22:22
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Hi bobbym
I have copied your code into Mathematica.What now?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#189 2012-04-12 21:26:46
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Try out one of our examples.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#190 2012-04-12 21:27:33
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
How do I enter it?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#191 2012-04-12 21:30:55
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#192 2012-04-12 21:36:17
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
It gives out an error.First it gives an error about the brackets,which I then change from normal () to square [].But now it gives an error about the Lattice Reduce Function.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#193 2012-04-12 21:37:07
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Please let me see the error.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#194 2012-04-12 21:38:57
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
LatticeReduce::latm : Matrix contains an entry that is not rational. >>
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#195 2012-04-12 21:43:18
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
How do you have pi entered in the first parameter?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#196 2012-04-12 21:45:10
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
as pi.Here is my input:
pslq[{-16.69947371922907049618724347541020677037, 1, pi, pi^2, pi^3, pi^4, pi^5, pi^6, pi^7}, 25]
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#197 2012-04-12 21:46:23
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Use a capital P or the escape character.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#198 2012-04-12 21:48:22
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
It works.Here's the output matrix:
Code:
{{24, 0, 0, 120, 0, 140, 0, -15, 0}, {-1020, -430, -77,
188, -802, -515, -743, -339, 202}, {-367, -461, -955, 317, 400, -72,
603, -923, 229}, {40, 509, -464, -705, 1310, -805, -76, -647,
229}, {1320, -100, 177, 585, -1344, -742, 188, 50, 8}, {-436,
491, -1733, -347, -118, 380, 282, 505, -200}, {419, -62, -756, -270,
1352, 97, -1105, 1090, -248}, {-222, 295, 774, -878, -429,
788, -669, -966, 355}, {-19, -1712, 637, -920, -43, -34, 34,
628, -199}}The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#199 2012-04-12 21:49:16
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Hi;
Make sure your code looks like this:
Code:
pslq[l_,dig_]:=Module[{a},
a=IdentityMatrix[Length[l]];
a=Append[a,10^dig*N[l,dig]];
a=Transpose[a];
a=Rationalize[a,10^-dig];
a=LatticeReduce[a];
Take[a,All,{1,Length[l]}];
a];In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#200 2012-04-12 21:51:38
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: PSLQ and LLL?
Right click the output and copy as latex you will get this:
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.