Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #6101 20121029 03:11:19
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaOkay, I will do that. Katie just replied which is good. #6102 20121029 03:18:21
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6103 20121029 03:34:24
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaShe didn't answer my question about her grandma but she did tell me what she is doing in maths, and she asked me the same. Of course, I don't do maths this year so didn't really have much to say. #6104 20121029 04:00:48
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6105 20121029 04:07:45
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaShe does. Maybe I could ask her on a date when she returns. Physically R is a bit on the large side but I feel like that doesn't matter. #6106 20121029 04:45:14
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYou can ask at anytime but only if you are sure of the answer. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6107 20121029 04:50:53
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI am never sure of the answer. I have to be prepared for #10 (the likely outcome). #6108 20121029 09:10:29
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaIf you think she may be valuable as a friend then if she disappears it will hurt double. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6109 20121029 09:12:32
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaBut if I am detached then I will not care so it will not hurt. #6110 20121029 09:18:31
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 Formula
Even if you are detached and feel no pain you do not cut off your arm. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6111 20121029 09:19:46
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI know plenty of other people applying for maths. #6112 20121029 09:25:10
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThen you can ask if you like. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6113 20121029 09:29:12#6114 20121029 10:09:22
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 Formula
R, if she would like to go out. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6115 20121029 10:15:56
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaSorry, I thought you were talking about Katie. Yes, I do want to ask out R at some stage, but I am worried about what to do if she says yes. #6116 20121029 10:39:22
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaThen you go out with her. We already talked about where to go. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6117 20121029 19:13:15
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHmm, I guess. Then that would detract from the power of the question on it's own, making a decision easier. #6118 20121029 21:40:45
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaAlso, I just saw the solution of deducing the sum of the reciprocals of the squares (π²/6) from the Fourier series of x/2. Could this be applied to find the sums of other series, such as the sum of the reciprocals of the cubes, for instance? #6119 20121029 23:25:21
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6120 20121029 23:33:02
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaIt appears that I can't find a way to use them for the reciprocals of the cubes. I got a result for the reciprocals or (2n + 1)^4 but I was out by a factor of one sixth. #6121 20121029 23:42:43
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6122 20121029 23:46:51
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaI know. Maybe she does not check her email often. Another girl I emailed from that class has not replied in about 48 hours. #6123 20121030 00:07:00
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaYes, up pops an answer but it seems to be not very useful for a particular series. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6124 20121030 00:14:25
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaNormally young people check their emails more often. We get sent feedback from our universities (whether we got an offer or a rejection) via email. Some people at my school check it almost every hour. #6125 20121030 00:22:53
Re: Linear Interpolation FP1 FormulaHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 