Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #51 2012-01-23 07:12:27

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

hi bobbym

well i would suggest you take the first 5 terms of the mclaurin's polynomial expansion and put in -0.1 instead of x.

Last edited by anonimnystefy (2012-01-23 09:45:02)

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #52 2012-01-23 09:09:39

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

HI anonimnystefy;

That would not get the correct answer.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #53 2012-01-23 09:19:29

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

hi bobbym

i don't know what's wrong with me.i keep using the incorrect numbers.i fixed it.anyway,you get the idea.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #54 2012-01-23 09:28:46

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

Hi;

Uhhhh, that one is not correct.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #55 2012-01-23 09:31:57

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

now?

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #56 2012-01-23 09:41:58

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #57 2012-01-23 09:45:18

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

edited for the fourth time

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #58 2012-01-23 09:53:10

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

Correct a mundo!

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #59 2012-01-23 09:53:46

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

next?

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #60 2012-01-23 09:58:40

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

Hmmm, have we squeezed all the juice out of the last question? I think not. Are 5 terms really necessary? Could you have provided a sharper bound then the Big O bound that wolfram provided?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #61 2012-01-23 17:44:19

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

hi bobbym

i don't know what you meant by that.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #62 2012-01-24 00:25:55

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

Hi anonimnystefy;

Can you do a little better than the answer provided by using Big O?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #63 2012-01-24 05:20:07

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

i don't know

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #64 2012-01-24 05:32:03

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

Oh okay. Holler if you would like to see how.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #65 2012-01-24 05:33:41

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

how.explain to me.but let me do it by myself.tell me how should i do it.

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #66 2012-01-24 05:35:32

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

Experimenting is okay. Did you try less terms for that truncated series?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #67 2012-01-24 09:16:50

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

hi bobbym

for 4 terms i found the abs. difference of about 4*10^(-6)

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #68 2012-01-24 09:21:58

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

What was the highest power in your truncated series?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #69 2012-01-24 09:23:53

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

hi bobbym

x^3.

oh yeah i forgot x^4.for that i get 8*10^(-8)

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #70 2012-01-24 09:30:50

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

Then what do you say about whether or not we can use a smaller series?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #71 2012-01-24 09:37:21

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

well we can,but only on experimental basis.if you were supposed to find the least number of terms you have to take,without that kind of calculation,then i would suggest using Big Oh notation.

btw,what is the name of the problem associated with this image:

i know that the literal translation from Serbian is "The Great Problem"

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #72 2012-01-24 09:42:46

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

Hi;

Beats me what that is?!

Yes, I would say we should stick to the Big O estimate here. So good work!

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #73 2012-01-24 09:45:44

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

next?

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #74 2012-01-24 09:50:26

John E. Franklin
Star Member

Offline

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

lots of parallel lines with those four circles.
Looks complicated.
Did you need to solve it?

igloo myrtilles fourmis

## #75 2012-01-24 09:53:31

bobbym

Online

### Re: Oh,Oh,Oh,merry analysis!!!

Hi;

Do you still need more today?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.