Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 103,826

Hi;

Then you must know that the answer is pi^2 / 6.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.** **A number by itself is useful, but it is far more useful to know how accurate or certain that number is.**

**Online**

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

Yes, I was tring to prove that without using series.

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 103,826

I get it now!

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.** **A number by itself is useful, but it is far more useful to know how accurate or certain that number is.**

**Online**

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

**17)**

*Last edited by gAr (2011-08-02 06:14:13)*

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**reconsideryouranswer****Member**- Registered: 2011-05-11
- Posts: 171

gAr & my edit wrote:

16)

The limit needs to approach from the right side of 0,

as amended above. There aren't any real values for

ln(x) from the left side of 0, so it is undefined there.

Signature line:

I wish a had a more interesting signature line.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**reconsideryouranswer****Member**- Registered: 2011-05-11
- Posts: 171

gAr wrote:

I am not "forgetting about" ln(1 - x). I was looking right at it and working with it, regardless if I mishandled it. x approaching 0 from either side is not an issue for ln(1 - x), as it is 0. But x approaching 0 from the left side of ln(x) is a problem, just as it is for x approaching from the left of, say, x^x, as those limits do not exist. And where is ln(-x) = ln(x) + ipi coming from? And then, why isn't your alleged expression this

instead of what you typed, because you assumed x --->0-? ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- And ----------------------------------------------------- on using*Last edited by reconsideryouranswer (2011-08-02 17:56:25)*

Signature line:

I wish a had a more interesting signature line.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

I see that you edited your post instead of replying.

Anyway,

Have you read about complex numbers? It exists and it is -∞

and this is 1

*Last edited by gAr (2011-08-02 20:14:25)*

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**reconsideryouranswer****Member**- Registered: 2011-05-11
- Posts: 171

gAr wrote:

and this is 1

Look at all of those negative x-values approaching 0 from the left where x^x is real.

For example, x =

-1/5, -1/25, -1/125, -1/625. -1/3125, ...

For these, x^x is approaching -1.

Signature line:

I wish a had a more interesting signature line.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

I would suggest you to go to www.wolframalpha.com

and enter this:

`Limit[x^x,{x->0},Direction->1]`

That would show you a graph along with the answer.

If you observe the graph, you'll see that the complex part approaches 0, and the real part approaches 1.

How did you calculate that it would approach -1? They should have been complex numbers, with positive real part.

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**reconsideryouranswer****Member**- Registered: 2011-05-11
- Posts: 171

gAr wrote:

How did you calculate that it would approach -1?

They should have been complex numbers, with positive real part.

Notice in the folowing lines how I will use fractions that

necessarily have odd denominators (for odd indices)

Let me show three of my examples worked out:

-------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------

I will use a fraction relatively much closer to 0:

-------------------------------------------------------------

Signature line:

I wish a had a more interesting signature line.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 103,826

Hi;

That is not correct.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.** **A number by itself is useful, but it is far more useful to know how accurate or certain that number is.**

**Online**

**reconsideryouranswer****Member**- Registered: 2011-05-11
- Posts: 171

bobbym wrote:

Hi;

That is not correct.

No, the odd root of a negative integer is some type of negative real number.

It must be.

Signature line:

I wish a had a more interesting signature line.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 103,826

No, the odd root of a negative integer is some type of negative real number.

It must be.

Yes but check this out! You are forgetting there are also complex answers.

This is one answer for (-1)^(1/3)

Are not the roots of

, ,What I am saying is just because (-1)^3 = -1 that does not mean ( -1) ^(1 / 3 ) is -1 solely. There are other answers. 3 of them as a matter of fact.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

**Online**

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

reconsideryouranswer, do you admit that you do not know complex numbers?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**reconsideryouranswer****Member**- Registered: 2011-05-11
- Posts: 171

bobbym wrote:

Yes but check this out! You are forgetting there are also complex answers.

This is one answer for (-1)^(1/3)

Are not the roots of

, ,

Signature line:

I wish a had a more interesting signature line.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: Harlan's World
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 16,015

sqrt(-1) doesnt exist because it is indefined.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.

Offline

**reconsideryouranswer****Member**- Registered: 2011-05-11
- Posts: 171

anonimnystefy wrote:

sqrt(-1) doesnt exist because it is indefined.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*** Edit*** I will stop posting to this subject thread for the foreseeable future.

*Last edited by reconsideryouranswer (2011-08-04 06:12:39)*

Signature line:

I wish a had a more interesting signature line.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 103,826

Hi;

You are making heavy use of the principal value of a square root being only the positive answer. But does that apply for cube roots and higher?

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CubeRoot.html

Both Mathematica and Maple do not agree.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

**Online**

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

**18) **

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 7,548

hi guys,

Sorry to jump in on your thread but would you mind casting an eye over

http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic … 03#p184503

Thanks,

Bob

Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

Hi Bob,

I was also confused with that, so couldn't reply!

Anyway, I'll try again.

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 7,548

hi gAr

Thanks for the response.

I'm happy with the substitution leading to the final DE. I'm really rusty on second order DEs having last done them about 30 years ago, so I was hoping for a second opinion on my final post.

Thanks

ps. I'm being called into the garden to help my wife so I'll log back in later.

Bob

*Last edited by bob bundy (2011-08-04 22:28:35)*

Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: Harlan's World
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 16,015

hi gAr

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.

Offline