Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #26 20100624 23:04:45
Re: Planet Killer?Theoretically in a perfect model of combustion you would have: But air is not just O2, It contains N,CO2,CO, and the inert gases. Also there are a hundreds of pollutants in it in varying quantities. Some of them would also combust, producing other pollutants. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #27 20100625 17:26:24
Re: Planet Killer?If the fuel didn't react to air it would've been controllable, though, right? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #28 20100625 17:59:06
Re: Planet Killer?Hi LQ; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #29 20100626 12:18:12
Re: Planet Killer?if one could purify the air before reaching the hydrogen, I thought? I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy... #30 20100626 13:26:42
Re: Planet Killer?I was just talking theoretically. That is the perfect reaction between pure hydrogen and pure oxygen. Burning hydrogen in the real world is not quite that simple. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #31 20100714 16:07:49
Re: Planet Killer?Hate to say I told you so, but BP flubs again! How predictable. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #32 20100715 16:39:06
Re: Planet Killer?
They used to just get Red Adair in, but there is a problem with that. Can feel it coming together.. Slowly but Surely #33 20100715 16:56:28
Re: Planet Killer?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #34 20100715 21:52:28
Re: Planet Killer?ha ha ha Can feel it coming together.. Slowly but Surely #35 20100715 23:00:20
Re: Planet Killer?Yes, but would yet let that creature , uhh I mean oilman, use your comb? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #36 20100720 17:42:06
Re: Planet Killer?The good news is that they may have capped it. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 