Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #201 20100524 21:55:35#202 20100524 21:57:38
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?You will be a wreck for tomorrow. Wearing yourself out. Many have died trying to stay up with me. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #203 20100524 22:04:02#204 20100524 23:15:29
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Well, I don't exactly agree. Math proficiency is a skill like bowling or pool playing, with enough practice anyone can be passable in ordinary life. Not getting your right enough sleep is not smart, let me put it that way In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #205 20100525 02:07:17#206 20100525 08:55:27
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Hi Sarah; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #207 20100526 05:00:43#208 20100530 16:52:40
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Hi Sarah; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #209 20100531 06:24:56#210 20100531 11:44:08
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Hi Sarah; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #211 20100601 04:29:01#212 20100601 06:43:24
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Hi Sarah; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #213 20100602 03:22:52#214 20100602 03:27:32
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Hi Sarah; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #215 20100603 00:04:16
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Good not yet. I will give you one when I need some Help #216 20100603 01:41:41#217 20100603 05:02:10
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Hi Sarah; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #218 20100604 01:33:52#219 20100604 01:43:33
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Hi Sarah; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #220 20100604 09:54:44#221 20100604 11:54:48#222 20100604 23:17:39#223 20100604 23:19:06#224 20100605 06:43:20#225 20100605 07:40:36
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?HI Sarah; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 