Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #126 2010-05-13 05:03:28
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Avacodo tastes plain, but the taste is barable, its the texture that provents me from eating it. Same thing with mashed potatoes and cooked spinach. I could deal with the taste, not the texture. I can eat spinach if its raw though. Of Moons, Birds and Monsters #127 2010-05-13 05:13:00
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Popeye can too. I have heard that on Melmak, Popeye is considered a geek. So don't go to Melmak. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #128 2010-05-13 05:14:56#129 2010-05-13 05:23:10
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Don't tell me you have a bad temper. Nothing worse than a woman with a bad temper. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #130 2010-05-13 05:55:51#131 2010-05-13 06:15:29
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?That means you don't have a bad temper. I've had both, the sulkers are a pain but somewhat easier to deal with than the hot tempered ones. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #132 2010-05-13 06:18:50#133 2010-05-13 06:29:59
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?A sulker. But I love head games, so I can be vicious. Other people are somewhat more fragile than I am. What doen't hurt me, wounds them terribly. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #134 2010-05-13 06:33:23#135 2010-05-13 06:42:48
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Not exactly, I am weaker in other ways. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #136 2010-05-13 06:49:29
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?I see. Of Moons, Birds and Monsters #137 2010-05-13 06:57:54
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?That's okay, you are a female. We don't have that luxury. We can't show any weakness at all, to anyone. Show a girl you are a nice guy and she will eat you. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #138 2010-05-13 07:04:36#139 2010-05-13 07:16:34
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Congratulations, you are the first of your gender to be so honest. I salute you! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #140 2010-05-13 07:19:43#141 2010-05-13 07:27:46
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Tons of them. I don't know about the modern Cosmo guy. He probably doesn't have any, but then again he is made out of cardboard. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #142 2010-05-13 07:39:23#143 2010-05-13 07:47:57
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Cosmopolitan magazine. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #144 2010-05-13 07:52:31#145 2010-05-13 07:55:34
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?I thought everyone read it. When I am on the line in a supermarket, I always see 1 or 2 people reading it. Some people even jot down little notes to emphasize what they think are particularly relevant paragraphs. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #146 2010-05-13 08:12:30#147 2010-05-13 08:18:16
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Well, I was saying yes, we have lots of faults. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #148 2010-05-13 10:14:24#149 2010-05-13 12:27:51
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?Nope, the rest of the guys have lots of faults. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #150 2010-05-14 01:00:57
Re: Is bobbym doing ok?I dont know what you guys are Talking about I guess got lift out of the pic |