Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #201 2010-04-26 01:22:35
Re: What do you think?That's right, very good! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #202 2010-04-26 23:48:14
Re: What do you think?Hi Bobby, "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #203 2010-04-27 07:38:52
Re: What do you think?
When you divide your answer by (x-9) what do you get for a remainder? Is it 10? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #204 2010-04-27 08:06:23
Re: What do you think?
I think so "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #205 2010-04-27 08:14:38
Re: What do you think?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #206 2010-04-27 09:06:20
Re: What do you think?Hi Bobby, Last edited by phrontister (2010-04-27 09:09:30) "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #207 2010-04-29 04:39:05
Re: What do you think?Hi phrontister; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #208 2010-04-29 12:55:57
Re: What do you think?Hi Bobby, "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #209 2010-04-29 12:57:13
Re: What do you think?Hi phrontister; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #210 2010-04-30 00:21:05
Re: What do you think?
That should read, "You will see that it requires no more math than you once knew"...although I don't recall ever learning about the Division Algorithm. "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #211 2010-04-30 00:29:33
Re: What do you think?Hi phrontister; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #212 2010-04-30 00:38:46
Re: What do you think?Thanks, Bobby. Looks like that page will help. I wasn't totally daunted by not understanding the D.A. and would have skipped it and tracked back if there was no choice, but I thought I'd at least have a bit of a go at tackling this from the ground up if it wasn't going to make life too difficult. "The good news about computers is that they do what you tell them to do. The bad news is that they do what you tell them to do." - Ted Nelson #213 2010-04-30 00:42:17
Re: What do you think?Hi phrontister; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #214 2010-05-01 16:38:21
Re: What do you think?
If two or more thoughts intersect with each other, then there has to be a point. #215 2010-05-01 17:24:33
Re: What do you think?Hi ZHero; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #216 2010-05-01 23:36:43
Re: What do you think?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #217 2010-05-01 23:49:57
Re: What do you think? Last edited by ZHero (2010-05-01 23:59:18) If two or more thoughts intersect with each other, then there has to be a point. #218 2010-05-01 23:55:28
Re: What do you think?That's Correct! Good, but please hide your answer, I am expecting hundreds of replies. Okay, dozens of replies... In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #219 2010-05-03 06:56:16
Re: What do you think?prob 46 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #220 2010-05-04 02:57:17
Re: What do you think?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #221 2010-05-04 03:39:07
Re: What do you think?Hey bobbym! If two or more thoughts intersect with each other, then there has to be a point. #222 2010-05-04 11:28:47
Re: What do you think?Hi ZHero; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #223 2010-05-04 13:36:17
Re: What do you think?Hey.. bobbym!!
so the factory must have first sold it for x. I mean, u cannot buy back without selling it first.. right? If two or more thoughts intersect with each other, then there has to be a point. #224 2010-05-04 15:43:37
Re: What do you think?Hi;
Since the factory manufactured them this implies a loss of some amount when they don't sell the product. B assumes a loss of x dollars as he states, his solution is based on that assumption. If their is no loss on each product then there is no maximum. Since the question does not indicate what the loss is, it is not possible to determine a maximum price. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #225 2010-05-04 16:51:27
Re: What do you think?
If two or more thoughts intersect with each other, then there has to be a point. |