You are not logged in.
Bobbym,
Why you didn't publish this key:
h ttp://vladimir938.eto-ya.com/files/2012/12/key-n5.jpg
?
You in vain don't listen to me. Not I thought up it. I take this information where took Tesla information on electricity. For example there the formula of the Binomial of Newton looks so:
h ttp://vladimir938.eto-ya.com/files/2012/12/newton.jpg
Hi;
This statement here
is read as the sum of all the little bits of u. So it equals
you just can not change the notation to suit yourself.
h ttp://vladimir938.eto-ya.com/files/2012/12/key-n5.jpg
- is error! - is true!!!Because
Hi bobbym!
Insert please this link:
h ttp://vladimir938.eto-ya.com/files/2012/12/key-n5.jpg
Hi 21122012
Before you post anything else, could you explai, in simple words, what the main difference is between Calculus and Structural Analysis?
Yes!
Structural Analysis, for example, analyzes all area of the Cartesian system of coordinates, and Calculus only part of this system - the line. And that it is wrong. Because on
Hi;
Don't you think there is something wrong with this. In words it says u is a function of y and h, depends on y and h. But in your definition you have x and C on the RHS. Where is an y or an h?
I wrote:
Hi;
But that is the point. Those are not the same. The first one is an antiderivative, the second one is an area.
So it also is. While the order won't be brought to Calculus it there will be a theory with limited opportunities.
Look #43.
In my opinion everything is clear even to the school student. You look the right top drawing #43
The concept PARAMETER has no definition. It in a general view value of other independent variable.
You look, what interesting things:
Two squares identical, but derivatives various!
WHY?!
I mean usual geometry. All its figures and constructions can be written down formulas. For example, cone:
Hi bobbym
Using Structural Analysis it is possible to describe all geometry instead of drawings as analytical formulas.
Clearly.
Oh, I understood everything! I not correctly raised a question. It was necessary to tell that Structural Analysis supplements Calculus and there already everything will turn out by itself. ERRORS of CALCULUS is a big psychological trauma. Mathematicians can't bear it. I understood it was necessary to begin on another! Supplements!
Correct, bobbym?!
Hi bobbim!
And it seems to me that all of them understand therefore write nothing. Silence - a consent. Simply are afraid to recognize that considered more than three hundred years a mistake as truth. What do you think?
Hi bobbym!
In my opinion, that I wrote clearly any school student! Why mathematicians is silent?
Probably, for the person it is better to have a mistake instead of truth, than something to change. It couldn't be even the last century. It seems that the mankind degrades.
Hi
What do the pictures represent? I don't understand what they are saying. What is structural analysis?
Also that you offer? I can offer only one not to open a new thread: start to read at first and as soon as will see the unclear - ask a question.
Hi
You shouldn't put up your email, for safety reasons.
Now, let me go through thread once more and then we can discuss what you want to discuss.
I want this. Please.
Hi, bobbym
I start to feel awkwardly because there are no comments. Let's have a talk though with you. That do I write what your opinion on that and with what you aren't agree?
In what basic distinction between SA and C? That for C the end result of dependence is important, for example:
and for SA is still important process as a result of which there is this dependence, for example: - square as result of construction of argument in the second degree; - square as special case of a rectangle; - square as sum of two identical rectangular isosceles triangles; - formula by means of which it is possible to write down the Fermat's Last Theorem, which condition settles down on one line: - the same only in the form of separate pieces; -square which area is expressed by length of a piece settling down on the coordinate plane at an angle to an axis of abscissae OU.These formulas are called as "structural formulas of function".
bobbym, correctly translates my robot translator into English? It not Chinese or Japanese? I for some reason don't see objections. With me all agree also you too?
Look at the bottom drawing of a post #43!
a)
: , may be other function at "x";b)
: ;c)
;d)
;e)
;f)
;g)
;And 2 functions:
h)
;i)
, on function graphics this line will have formula. In other cases I will give a formula of a general view later.The main mistake of founders of calculus in that that they badly studied: "Descartes's Rules for the Direction of the Mind".
Because when horizontal (OX) and vertical (OY) pieces that are postponed the rectangle turns out
In calculus geometrical examples is errors, because it not geometrical objects, but it is graphic objects!
If want to understand geometrical sense of a derivative, consider for a start such example:
1. The area of a circle is radius function:
I developed the mathematical atlas in which communication between an algebraic geometrical analytical and graphic form of record of mathematical objects is shown. That is having taken for consideration any object from these sections it is possible to see its interpretation in other sections.
On the basis of the foregoing I will repeat the main thought of this theme:
- is true. - is error.