You are not logged in.
infinity. Deciamls and fractions should solve your problem. Unless the question wants natural numbers.
Well, averages don't exist in real life... especially non-natural numbers. But all the same, averages are very interesting
Yes. If I could get it, I would. This program would make life easier, and it can also be a 2 dimensional simulator. Well, It would be better in 3D though.
*Takes LQ's harpoon and throws it at a rubber dingy above the surface*
exactly, Kid 'Fun' Fact: Day/night at the poles are half an Earth year long.
more than a calculator, I suppose, but you can't cube root a number in 1 step using a calculator. you can only sqrt it 2 times..... what a waste of time. Does it apply to all numbers?
It isn't, because with Girls = G*i*r*l*s and Time = T*i*m*e and Evil = E*v*i*l, although it may work, there are certain pieces that just don't fit.... why don't say that TievElmi = TimeEvil ? That should apply.
I was getting to that. Anyway I thought no one would notice the other context, the read 'my mind' and 'your mind' because I don't have a certain speech difficulty.
I just don't get it. Why does Microsoft want to rule the world with a replica of a scientific calculator? What good would it gain, apart from a short term applause from soon to be ungrateful audience?
whatever it is, I hate soap ads because they try to clean my absolutely lovely and dirty television set.
These... are all nonsensical ideas made up by certain members of this forum using .
might as well say that algebra is one of the most flawed concepts ever?
Ah, yes. Permutation and Combination. An interesting subject. Don't mean to be annoying... Theres a P & C calculator here, right?
Explore the different functions, there must be one. and this site has a prime number thing to determine if a number is prime.
No, a prime number list:
http://www.mathsisfun.com/numbers/prime-number-lists.html
BUT using the same method, we can prove that algebra cannot prove it is consistent using algebra.... haha!!
I'll think about atopping to think.... These are related to paradoxes, aren't they?
algebra can prove anything.
well, these things are arguing about things that differ in quantity, not total number...
yes, even the curry's paradox quadrilateral one, because if you line the correct angles of the quadrilateral properly, (even the convex ones) it will tesselate. This is because the sum of all the interior angles of a quadrilateral is 360 degrees.
tessalations, but only works with regular: triangle, qrudrilateral, hexagon. all triangle and qudrilateral tesselate.
THAT is fantastic, WOW!!
Those are great!
actually, the "triangle" is actually a quadrillateral, and the second diagram, ignoring the "missing" square, is a four sided figure, except that one of the angles looks like a straight line. the two triangles are not similar.
brnss (say it aloud)
brswlkn (need I say? )
These are very easy, you'll kick yourselves if I tell you answers... If you guys don't solv'em.
Srinivasa Ramanujan