You are not logged in.
Nice assortment there, ZHero!
But I think #3 is missing the ceiling function:
Here's another for your collection:
THANKS!!
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
skymus: Your avatar is simply smashing!!!
dumb
PERL
Persio-English Remix Language
ROBOT
Rarely Obvious But Obviously Terminator
PCI
Potato Chips Inarguably
BOOT
Barely Outputs Ordered Type
( i did them myself )
"I find you very attractive" LOL
If you're positive then I'm sorry to say that I'm negative...
Superb!!
I love the "zero" thing anyways... LOL!
425 % 35= 420 r 5 or 420 reminder 5.
I need the exact answer...
Try This Approach..............
Give more expressions where you are facing a problem currently or otherwise....
yes , the answer is
The power of 10 should be 2 instead of 3. Plz check the Question again... Did you copy it EXACTLY??
ZHero wrote:You can do a Quick Approximation but its hard to do it Quickly unless you are real good at Multiplication/Division of Large numbers!!
Quick approximation?? How can that be done..
Have a look at Post #5 above.
Try to Approximate the Numerator and Denominator to the nearest possible multiples of 5 or 10 and then you can simplify quickly!
I'll give you a few examples.....................
You can do a Quick Approximation but its hard to do it Quickly unless you are real good at Multiplication/Division of Large numbers!!
He is looking for a General Solution for the lengths of all such XY's for all Regular Polygons (no. of sides > 4)!
I don't know if thats possible or not...
May be, he'll come up with a General Approach instead!?
Here is another (and perhaps Tougher) version of the same question...
Try calculating the answer for this and see!!
DERIVED UNITS!!!!
that's Exactly what you call them!!
I had forgotten he he . .
I showed him your reply and...
mmmm... Can we try solving it using Euclidean Geometry only?
Sort of... NO USE of co-ordinate system and vectors!
(he says he does 'em using Similar Triangles and Trigonometry )
Thanks for looking into it!
How is it that s is -2 though kg is -1. Does it just denote that m/s is a ratio and kg is a definite unit?
s is -2 coz its meter per second squared (unit of acceleration).
understand it like this..
As you can see, it appears to be a ratio but is rather a "Rate of Change w.r.t Time"!
ms[sup]-1[/sup] is same as m/s and so on...
no derivatives
I can't find the remaining word anywhere...
I can spot only "DAET" at the Top of Fourth Column!??
My speed was like