You are not logged in.
What do you not understand?
Yeah, so it's basically
There is an identity on Wiki that says that Gamma(z)*Gamma(1-z)=pi/sin(pi*z).
Hi bobbym
Ricky wrote:(It may be noted that matrices of integers are groups).
Are you sure? Or have I misunderstood something here?
I don't think they are a group under multiplication, because not all the matrices in the set have inverses...
Hi bobbym
Hi Agnishom
I like the example of a ball on a curved surface.
When the surface is straight, the equilibrium is neutral, because you can move the ball around and it will stay in the place you move it.
When the surface is curved down, the equilibrium is unstable on the highest point of the surface, because if you push the ball just a little bit, it will fall down.
When the surface is curved up, the ball will fall back to the lowest point when you push it, so it's a stable equilibrium.
Then I'd either find a very fast and powerful computer or do a lot of number theory.
m and n aren't equal. The fact that they are not allows us to divide by (m-n)...
You froze your brother? ![]()
What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
Hi bobbym
I am getting
Yes, that goes without saying. ![]()
Just, out of pure respect, should we be saying the Oracle?
A high-schooler with 3 years of chemistry can sure confirm that! ![]()
I get the "fungi" all the time when working numerical stuff in M. The fungi part most often appears next to the imaginary number, so the answer appears to be complex, when it is, in fact, real.
Hmmm, how can you follow what I am posting if we speak different languages?
We already found that that can be quite a problem.
I like Nordic languages in general. They just sound very cool!
Hi ronn
M give the answer of
.Hi ganesh
Actually, I twisted the signs a little. It's not 2/3. M gets QPochhammer[1/2, 1/2]...
Hi
The answer is 2/3.
You NEVER divide by infinity. More precisely, you NEVER use infinity as a number. What you do in physics class is look at the limit of the expression as one of the distances tends to infinity. You just use it intuitively without notation.
I can just say 1,3,9,27,81...
Hi ffd
Yes, I've seen it. I'm trying to find 1/k^(1/k) when k tends to infinity.
I didn't say anything about 80. I said it about 81.