You are not logged in.
If I'm not mistaken that's from a thread in which noemi suggests that you should be my best man.
Here's a program that writes out most of the lyrics of an older popular song:
Do[Print["Na"], {56}]Lyrics nowadays are usually nonsense. "This is my kingdom come"... What does that even mean?
That should be "This is my kingdom, come", I'd say.
Mmm, yes. I wanted to tell 1+ (pos# mod 7), I overlooked it.
Ah, okay then. I wasn't sure which definition to hold true. Thanks for the clarification.
Hi gAr
Shouldn't the positions be numbered 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,0,1,2, ?
the incident matrix has exactly two ones and 6 zeros in each column.
Why is that?
Yes, but we can start by noting that the graph conatins exactly 8 edges.
Maybe 'similar' doesn't mean what I said.
Have you seen the whole post #4?
Hi bobbym
I made the mistake in taking the Binomial[4,3] to be 3 when doing it by hand.
How are you getting that?
What do you get for 3?
Hi
I am actually getting 7/81 for a)i), bobbym. Are you sure you are counting only the cases with 3 and 4 correct answers?
Almost trivial 2: Connect each point only to itself with a directed loop. Both matrices have 1s on the leading diagonal and zeros elsewhere.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_(mat … mple_graph
As opposed to a multigraph, a simple graph is an undirected graph that has no loops (edges connected at both ends to the same vertex) and no more than one edge between any two different vertices.
![]()
Also, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_similarity.
The only thing I am able to think up about this problem is that the graph has to have exactly 8 edges.
I'd say both are true, it just depends on what you take as your variable.
The inverse of
is .Hi bobbym
Haven't checked the answers on previous pages yet, but I have come up with some sort of .
Sure, I don't think Lagrange is able to complain.
That's the one I would use here. The formula was found by Lagrange, though, not me.
Hi caters
Think about it - for every integer, there is a corresponding double. This is an intuitive way of thinking about sizes of infinite sets, but this logic is also used to define the formal way of comparing set sizes.
It is the most watched video on youtube so far. But PSY is still not able to calculate the square root of 1000000000.
Hi PatternMan
Welcome to the forum!
I agree,
I'm pretty sure he meant 4/5 and 1/2, but, we can wait.
Hi phro
I was actually making a reference to this.
Hi
I am getting 5/8.
Hi phro
And you can always get funding by putting a dollar in your pocket and pulling out two dollars!