You are not logged in.
In math whatever we plug number to x it shift it horizontally but if plug it like that f(x) +1 it shifted it vertically
But my problem in e^x it shifted on y-axis when I plug 1 for example. what is the secret behind that
Like e^(x+1)
It should shift the e^(x+1) to the left! But it’s didn’t happen why
Like x^2 when plug +1 which became (x+1)^2 it shifted it to left! Correct
Hi,
int number 123456;
int firstDigit;
int totalDigits = (int) Math.log10(number);
firstDigit = (int) (number/ (int) Math.pow(10,totalDigits));
System.out.println("First Digit is: " + firstDigit);
how could log10 of a number like 123456 is 5?
I type that in google and it's 5.09151220163 not 5, I know we used casting so it discard the fractional parts to get 5, but my question is not about the Java it's about log10 why log10 always get the total digits with fractional parts always!
like log10 of 532 is 2.7259116323 which is 2 digits that is working! but how mathematically is that
how can Math.log10(12345) calculate the number of digits which is 5 correct!?
only that first part of the code is really ambiguous
so you mean for example :
for (1,1)
(1 % 2) + (1 % 2) = 1 + 1 = 1 white, is this the way I apply by numbers? am I correct
and please why the book in the end used additional mod :
color = ( (row % 2) + (column % 2) ) % 2
look he used again %2!! he found sum of reminders than take mod 2 again? why? and where locations should I apply this formula only in the last row? because he said "fourth entries" is he mean the last row, isn't enough to use only (row%2) + (col%2)
Hi, I have this problem the solution it needs is not advanced not using "if and else statement" the book needs to see the answer with simple algebra.
I have the question and the solution but it's not understandable completely expect I know that we need mod 2 (ODD and even) in my solution.
A robot needs to tile a floor with alternating black and white tiles. Develop
an algorithm that yields the color (0 for black, 1 for white), given the row and
column number. Start with specific values for the row and column, and then
generalize
////// solution of the book start
Solution of the book :
Clearly, the answer depends only on whether
the row and column numbers are even or odd,
so let’s first take the remainder after dividing by 2. Then we can enumerate all expected
answers:
In the first three entries of the table, the color
is simply the sum of the remainders. In the
fourth entry, the sum would be 2, but we want
a zero. We can achieve that by taking another
remainder operation:
color = ( (row % 2) + (column % 2) ) % 2
////// solution of the book Ended
pls explain the book solution only I want to understand it step by step I didn't understand what he mean by dividing
note that the dividing here is integer division ex : 3/2 = 1 not 1.5 because it discard the fractional part
I didn't understand the solution from beginning like " first take the remainder after dividding by 2"
which reminder? and what number we are dividing it by 2 ?
the solution is confusing be and ambiguous
Hello,
See:
https://i.postimg.cc/rs1py38L/mathclarificationopaque.png
thank you a lot
can you plot D area in the graph please I want to see it and to feel it, you give me excellent explantion but still the image not completed in my mind
how cold write
to becomewhat is microfabrication related to mathematics?
if anyone have ideas, comments, opinion, on that topic please talk here
How so? As zetafunc mentions above, the function
is equivalent to the function you mentioned, and the equation is continuous.
can you please see this YouTube link it talked about it and it said there is differences :-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmxESGI4zdA&t=18s
also see this sheet pls :
Yes, the equation does represent continuous growth. As noted, you can convert that equation into the form of the continuous standard equation
with the substitution mentioned above.
I think it's not right, because I found the answer today
the form model without e and k like this :
so now
its growth rate is not continuous,
am I right?
by the way I learned this today from a YouTube channel but I still don't understand why we can't called the base a a continuous if it's >1
I knew because it doesn't included the numbers that less than 1 and bigger than 0
but why? why this is a reasons that we can't call it continuously, what is meaning continuously in this case anyway? because every graph I draw in form of non-continuous exponential models I see them clearly in my naked eyes that they are continuous, I draw these random examples as in example I see them all goes beyond without end
Hannibal lecter wrote:Bob wrote:I hope I have answered all your questions here. I found it difficult to keep scrolling back to two separate posts. I would rather you kept them separate, thanks.
Bob
yes sorry I'm trying to use the site in better ways
so branch 7,8 continues growth of rate
andwhat about branch 5,6 :
can we say it's continuous growth of rate too?No, because . Continuous growth is modeled with the equation
, where is the ending value, is the initial value, is Euler's constant, is the continuous growth rate, and is the time that has passed.Diregard what I wrote above; as zetafunc helpfully noted,
could be represented as .
I'm talking about e and k and exponential form I'm talking about this form :
is the growth rate 7% here is called continuous or we can't call it this
yes what is that gradient value of -k?
I hope I have answered all your questions here. I found it difficult to keep scrolling back to two separate posts. I would rather you kept them separate, thanks.
Bob
yes sorry I'm trying to use the site in better ways
so branch 7,8 continues growth of rate
what about branch 5,6 :
and please I have another question confused me again also :
why we say function P growth rate is continuous and function y growth rate is just increasing
isn't should be continuous too as in P??? I graph it in graph calculator it looks continuous
I see the manual solution it's also state the P is has continuous rate of change, but in Y he just said "increasing or decay"
note that I found this problem from an exercise and here it is :
I learned in math that if the graph is a line it's continuous if it's not a separate points!!
yes what is that gradient value of -k?
what you mean when it's decreasing rate what you mean you mean it become for example -5 % then -4% then -3%
is it in that function decreasing and getting horizontal like that? or how, is it a constant value decreasing rate for example -50%
and what is value of k represented in that mentioned function is it rate of the medicine in the blood of patient being decreased
or it's the rate of change in the saturation level will get to its end, or what is it I I know S meaning saturation level and t mean time but what is k represent in that example
Hi, please see this example talking about converting exponential function form from
it's easy and understandable as you see in the following picture :-
as you can see the growth rate here is (1 - 1.65= 65%) and it's increasing rate because 1.65 > 1
and in the other function is (1-0.819 = 18.1%) and it's decreasing rate because 0 < 0.819 < 1
and I tested them all,
my problem is I found another function I wonder if I can convert it like the others too and the function is because I'm unable to find the rate while I convert it to the classic form (without e) :-
lets say k=1,t≥0
I want to convert it too so I can see the initial value and the growth rate
I just want to convert it because I want to compare between growth/decay in the form of
the reason that I want to convert it to classic form because in the book as highlighted in yellow "..the quantity increases at a decreasing rate"
again directly it said "This is realistic because as the quantity of the drug in the body increases, so does the rate at which
the body excretes the drug..."
so now I'm confused! once it say the rate is decreasing and again it said the rate is increasing, I want to know the rate in the classic form to check it by myself if it's decreasing or if it's not ( I mean the rate change not the function)
also it's strange equation it's without initial value!
I tried to convert it with my own way like this :
You can adjust the number of pages that are shown at once in your profile. Does that work?
Bob
it's not working for my posts option but no problem I found the post because I don't have much posts
but do you think the site can upgrade to become more advanced or the site owner are busy and not there to think about how to upgrade it
if f(1) = 250*a = 150
f(4) = 250* a^2 = 90
solving the equation to find a
I found similar question on a book I study from an example above in the picture :
but I made my own example with simple number to make it easy to illustrate
my problem and my question is how cold he dividing the two equations ( in my example and in the book example)
what thing gives to him the mechanism to do that to find the missing "a"
I mean they are two separate equation and lets say the f(1) is mean the time in first hour, and f(4) is the time of fourth hour
so they are different so what rules he lean on it to do such thing to solve this equation by dividing the two of them by themselves
note that I create my example from the book source itself (the answer is 0.59999 which men 60% percent I know the answer for the example I made but the answer is coming out like a magic I want to understand the concept of dividing two equations togather) :
hi,
what happen when we multiply decimal by a percentage and it is different from the concept of regular multiplication numbers concept
for example
multiply 3 * 4 is 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12 or 4+4+4 = 12
the clearest explanation of this simply mean 4 copies of 3 added togather or 3 copies of 4
but
when we multiply
100 * 50% it's clearly mean 100 * 50/100 = 100
what is the deep explanation of that mean?
It's worth using this method, especially if you have a lot of calculation involving the same % increase.
Bob
I completely now understand the methods and everything about that multiplier
can you please see this following photo (I highlighted the number in red lines) :-
posted image
the book called this multiplier a growth factor! as you can see,
so is that multiplier the same as exponent? or what is it called
is it right to called it a growth factor
and thanks
hi
13.290 M / 12.853 M = 1.034
You are wondering how they got the correct percentage from this.
So an easy way to get the % increase from is just to take off the 1 (= 12.853/12.853)
In situations like these taking off the 1 will always work as 1 is the same as 100% which is the original amount before the increase.
Bob
from this screenshot I'll post in the following please if you may see it I highlighted the value by red color :
so is the number 1 + 0.034 = (1.034) called a growth factor or constant of growth or the exponent? but the exponent is ≈ 2.718?!!?
and why the book used this way? not this regular law the we always use to find percentage increase { [amount of increase] / [original amount] times 100%) }
, to illustrate the meaning of 1.034??
Have you tried to learn LaTex? http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=4397
Bob
they are not working
look please :
<\frac{1}{k}>
is still the same on my screen didn't changed