You are not logged in.
mathland wrote:ganesh wrote:The best part of it is you needn't be answerable! Being independent is a boon!
A lot of friends and former friends cannot understand my independentabiliy.
It's too bizarre for them to pin point.It is their point of view. Ignore it.
Ignore is right. I need to increase my COULD CARE LESS attitude
mathland wrote:ganesh wrote:True! A little later in my life, I collected pictures of actors!
I took autographs of film artistes!
And after around 25, priorities shifted.
It was a hobby to you.
Yes, it was a hobby at that point of time.
But, as we grow, priorities shift.
Fortunately, learning has been a top priority.
Math is a hobby for me at this stage in my life. I don't think I'll ever stop learning new mathematical ideas.
mathland wrote:ganesh wrote:I was born in a religion which respects all religions.
I am happy to tell I respect all religions.
You are a smart person. Respect all religions as long as there is no violence connected to faith.
That is the bottom line.
Exactly. I say Jesus is the way to Heaven. All religions have their own way to Heaven.
Who's right? We'll just have to wait and see. We long to see Heaven but refuse to accept death as a door into the afterlife.
.
mathland wrote:ganesh wrote:I am happy to be single as well. Less heartaches to deal with.
The best part of it is you needn't be answerable! Being independent is a boon!
A lot of friends and former friends cannot understand my independentabiliy.
It's too bizarre for them to pin point.
mathland wrote:ganesh wrote:Acceptance is paramount. We are all humans.
We are all human. I don't have all the answers.
Understandable!
A double life is too complicated to deal with. Be the person you were meant to be.
mathland wrote:ganesh wrote:Being alone is not new to me. Most of my life, I have been alone, and I enjoy every bit of it.
You and I are the same in this respect. I love my alone time.
Yes! None to distub or distract!
I am passionate about my alone to such a degree that people think I am antisocial. Well, I am not antisocial. I just prefer being alone most of the time.
mathland wrote:I have decided to reduce the number of threads per day. This will allow me to spend more quality time per reply. I am about to step into the scary related rates section. I will spend a lot of time in this section as it is crucial for me to learn how to solve these applications of the derivative.
I also will post more questions that have several parts. This alone will reduce the number of threads. Keep in mind that I don't have a computer or a laptop. All my questions are copied and pasted but the math work shown is typed via cell phone only. This takes forever to do.
Good decision!
I think so. Why clog the site with so many questions? It's not like I am actually going to achieve anything.
mathland wrote:ganesh wrote:I had been an autograph-hunter in my late teens, I have taken autographs of eminent sports persons.
A prized possession!
To each his own.
True! A little later in my life, I collected pictures of actors!
I took autographs of film artistes!
And after around 25, priorities shifted.
It was a hobby to you.
I have decided to reduce the number of threads per day. This will allow me to spend more quality time per reply. I am about to step into the scary related rates section. I will spend a lot of time in this section as it is crucial for me to learn how to solve these applications of the derivative.
I also will post more questions that have several parts. This alone will reduce the number of threads. Keep in mind that I don't have a computer or a laptop. All my questions are copied and pasted but the math work shown is typed via cell phone only. This takes forever to do.
I had been an autograph-hunter in my late teens, I have taken autographs of eminent sports persons.
A prized possession!
To each his own.
mathland wrote:ganesh wrote:Selfishness : the quality or state of being selfish : a concern for one's own welfare or advantage at the expense of or in disregard of others : excessive interest in oneself.
Lead a Double life : to not tell the whole truth about one's life.
Okay, but I just said 'There have been times I have been a bit selfish (very few occasions, and more often, unknowingly), but it is past now. I tried to be a good man, a good member of the society.
I feel a person ought to become better, as there is no point in brooding at a later date.'
Every sensible person knows that all are selfish, to varied degrees. It may by 0.01%, or it may be 99.99%.
It is just like 'no one is perfect'. Perfection may be 99.99% or 0.01%. Can you think of perfection at all times? We are all humans.
Only God is perfect and He does not boast about His perfect being.
Example of a double life is, for example, telling your friends and family that you are a Christian but secretly living a carnal lifestyle.
Acceptance is paramount. We are all humans.
We are all human. I don't have all the answers.
Being alone is not new to me. Most of my life, I have been alone, and I enjoy every bit of it.
You and I are the same in this respect. I love my alone time.
Hi mathland,
I was messing around with the 'Image of BBCode page' and changed the url, not realising that it would disable the link in your last post.
So if you particularly want to see the image version of that page, you'll now have to click on the link in my post instead of yours.
Sorry 'bout that, but I can't undo what I've done!
Don't worry about it. It's ok.
I feel like the people who have an autograph have a piece of the person they admire
Ok. I see nothing with this but I myself choose not to request an autograph unless the piece of paper will put money in my bank account.
I feel like most people are good people morally but it is hard to start a conversation to someone you dont know.
You say most people are good, morally speaking. This is your opinion. I respect your point of view. The Bible clearly makes known the fact that no one is good except for God.
mathland wrote:ganesh wrote:There have been times I have been a bit selfish (very few occasions, and more often, unknowingly), but it is past now. I tried to be a good man, a good member of the society.
I feel a person ought to become better, as there is no point in brooding at a later date.
Selfishness is not the same as living a double life. Have you ever told a group of people that you are doing A when in fact you are doing B? In other words, did you ever pretend be someone you are not?
Selfishness : the quality or state of being selfish : a concern for one's own welfare or advantage at the expense of or in disregard of others : excessive interest in oneself.
Lead a Double life : to not tell the whole truth about one's life.
Okay, but I just said 'There have been times I have been a bit selfish (very few occasions, and more often, unknowingly), but it is past now. I tried to be a good man, a good member of the society.
I feel a person ought to become better, as there is no point in brooding at a later date.'
Every sensible person knows that all are selfish, to varied degrees. It may by 0.01%, or it may be 99.99%.
It is just like 'no one is perfect'. Perfection may be 99.99% or 0.01%. Can you think of perfection at all times? We are all humans.
Only God is perfect and He does not boast about His perfect being.
Example of a double life is, for example, telling your friends and family that you are a Christian but secretly living a carnal lifestyle.
mathland wrote:ganesh wrote:I cannot tell about others, but for me, my religion has made me a complete person. The ups and downs, happy and sad, I tried to be in equanimity.
What is your faith? What is your religion?
I was born in a religion which respects all religions.
I am happy to tell I respect all religions.
You are a smart person. Respect all religions as long as there is no violence connected to faith.
See the link : Inverse Trigonometric Ratios.
What about taking the derivative of inverse trig functions? How is this done?
hi Jordan123
Welcome to the forum.
I think you're wondering why
Power notation was invented as a shortcut for repeated multiplication
From this we have the three laws for powers:
For all of this it is assumed that m and n are positive integers and they're easy to prove.
But mathematicians don't like limitations like this (the positive integer bit) if it can be avoided. So they have sought to extend the definition whilst maintaining the three laws.
So let's start with "What could a zero power mean?"
From law 2, if m = n we have
But a^m over a^m must be 1, so let's define a^0 to be 1 for all values of a.
Now for a fraction like 1/2
From law 1
So a to the power 1/2 behaves exactly like the square root of a, so let's define it to be that.
There's loads more of this sort of thing, all created definitions based on the three laws. It leads to a whole area of maths that is consistent and useful so it has kind of stuck, And why not?
Bob
Excellent notes. How about a^(3/2)?
This is sqrt{a^3}.
Yes?
You're going to need to differentiate y = 1/√x and set that equal to -1/16
B
Ok. I can do that, really.
You can use that formula but it is also possible to do it from the equation as given.
Bob
I will show my work for this one when time allows. Thanks again. I appreciate your time and effort. I will reduce the amount of questions posted.
See the link for reference : Implicit Differentiation.
Ok. Thanks.
Yes. Go ahead.
Bob
Very good. Very cool.
It's useful to know what the graph is like. Here's a link https://www.mathsisfun.com/data/grapher-equation.html
You can copy and paste the equation as it is.
In case you cannot do this I'll also describe it. It's a (valentine) heart shape coming to a sharp point at (0,0) but more rounded at the bottom.
Differentiation is only allowed where the limit as you approach a point from the left is the same as from the right. A function for which this is always true has a curvature that changes smoothly. At a point with a sharp change of direction the gradient is undefined at the point since the left limit and the right limit are different. That's why the origin is excluded.
Once you have done the implicit differentiation you can substitute dy/dx = 0 to find the horizontal lines. It looks like there are three points with two sharing the same tangent.
If you make dy/dx the subject of the equation then you can consider what points will make the gradient 'shoot off to infinity'. That will give the vertical tangents.
Bob
I'll work on it.
phrontister wrote:You can also click on 'Quote' in the bottom right-hand corner of someone's post to help learn how they did this or that.
More stuff:
If you're logged in, you'll have a 'BBCode' button near the bottom-left corner of the screen. Click on it to open a page with codes for:
- Text Styles
- Links and images
- Quotes
- Code
- Lists
- SmiliesA small 'Nested tags' section shows how to use codes within codes (eg, to display an image hidden by 'hide' tags...as I've done below).
Here is a link to that page: BBCode
And if you click on 'Quote' in the bottom right-hand corner of my post you'll get a good idea about how I did what I did.
I'll work on it.