Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#52 Re: Help Me ! » Linear Differential Equations » 2015-04-04 02:27:36

bob bundy wrote:

Do you know why we have to choose e^(something) for these, why no other solutions are possible

and also why the general solution is c1.(a particular solution) + c2.(another particular solution)?

#54 Re: Help Me ! » Linear Differential Equations » 2015-04-03 04:27:09

Let

[list=*]
[*]

[/*]
[/list]

and suppose

[list=*]
[*]

[/*]
[/list]

for some v0. Then

[list=*]
[*]

[/*]
[/list]

Since the LHS is zero for some x, y not both zero, the determinant of the matrix on the LHS must be 0.

Note that eigenvalues can be complex.

#56 Re: Puzzles and Games » Mathemagic » 2015-03-31 22:06:00

The most general theorem of all:

(NB: If N contains one or more 0, we allow Nʹ to start with a 0. For example, if N = 1024, Nʹ can be 0241; in this case N is a 4-digit number whereas Nʹ = 241 is a 3-digit one.)

Proof of the most general theorem of all:

We know that a positive integer is congruent modulo 9 to the sum of its digits. For example, 12345 ≡ 1+2+3+4+5 = 15 ≡ 1+5 = 6 (mod 9) (i.e. it leaves a remainder 6 when divided by 9).

This is based on the fact that
is divisible by 9 for all non-negative integers k (these are numbers of the form 0, 9, 99, 999, 9999, etc). Therefore if N is a k-digit number with digits
, we have

[list=*]
[*]

for all
[/*]
[/list]

and adding up the i gives

So N is congruent to the sum of its digits mod 9. Similarly Nʹ is congruent to the sum of its digits mod 9. But the sum of the digits of N and the sum of the digits of Nʹ are the same since the digits of one are those of the other rearranged. This means

[list=*]
[*]

[/*]
[/list]

and so their difference is divisible by 9. QED.

#57 Re: Help Me ! » Floor functions » 2015-03-31 20:06:19

cooljackiec wrote:

Why did you guys remove {x}

Sorry, it was a typo. I've put it back in post #9.

#58 Re: Help Me ! » Floor functions » 2015-03-31 03:43:42

bob bundy wrote:

Strictly, as you have one thing ≥ x and another ≥ 0, when you add them you get (one thing + another) ≥ x

No, I have the first thing > x and the other ≥ 0.

#59 Re: Help Me ! » Floor functions » 2015-03-31 00:03:58

Okay, this should work. For all x,

[list=*]
[*]

[/*]
[/list]

because
.

Also, for all x,

[list=*]
[*]

[/*]
[/list]

(Fractional parts cannot be neagative.)

for all x.

Is this better, Bob? smile

#60 Re: Help Me ! » Floor functions » 2015-03-30 23:42:20

Oops, I did it wrong. sad

Back to the drawing board.

#61 Re: Help Me ! » Floor functions » 2015-03-30 21:24:01

Here's an algebraic proof. For all x,

[list=*]
[*]

[/*]
[/list]

#63 Re: Jokes » Some more clean jokes! » 2015-03-29 19:13:07

"So, Peter, you've finally come to believe in the existence of the fourth dimension of reality."

"Yes, Paul, it's about time."

#64 Re: Maths Teaching Resources » Brilliant Mathematics and Science Wikis » 2015-03-29 00:31:57

Is there a section on group theory or abstract algebra? Or algebraic topology?

#65 Re: Jokes » One Liners » 2015-03-28 08:01:52

San Andreas should be blamed for all the earthquake activity in California because it's his fault.

#68 Re: Help Me ! » conics » 2015-03-25 22:57:17

Oh! Thank you Bob, I forgot about the tan formula. smile

#69 Re: Help Me ! » conics » 2015-03-25 21:26:41

The gradient at P to the curve is straightforward to compute: it's
. Also T is the point
and P is
.

Since TPG is a right angle, TG is the diameter of the circle passing through P, T, G. Therefore the centre of the circle lies on the x-axis; it is in fact
. Thus the equation of the circle is

[list=*]
[*]

[/*]
[/list]

Implicit differentiation gives

[list=*]
[*]

[/*]
[/list]

at P.

Hence the angle between the two tangents is

[list=*]
[*]

[/*]
[/list]

PS: It's actually

[list=*]
[*]

[/*]
[/list]

since the gradient to the curve will always be steeper than the gradient to the circle.

#71 Re: Puzzles and Games » Mate in three? » 2015-03-23 04:45:51

This is a much more interesting puzzle than I thought. If indeed all variations end with mate in three, it must have taken a super genius brain to work them out, given there were no computers in the 19th century. I can see why it won first prize. smile

#73 Re: Puzzles and Games » Mate in three? » 2015-03-23 00:53:18

Oh, I didn't see that. Thanks, SteveB.

#74 Puzzles and Games » Mate in three? » 2015-03-22 22:34:34

Olinguito
Replies: 19

This is a chess problem from The Illustrated London News, a 19th-century publication. According to the author it is possible for white to mate in three moves but I can't find a solution. swear

[list=*]
[*]e717593f77dea03e8a22cf5808a0434b.jpg[/*]
[/list]

The best I can do is
I analysed the problem at http://www.chesslab.com/PositionSearch.html but it couldn't find a mate-in-three either; however it did find an

Can anyone find a mate in three, if there is one? Phrontister? sad

#75 Re: Puzzles and Games » Jane’s cryptic crossword clues » 2015-03-16 21:50:23

I think the last one should be

JaneFairfax wrote:

#23. Legal heir will cut up ginger. (4,9)

#24. Stick insect and mammal. (7, 3)

#25. Seriousness is what can pull you down. (7)

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB