Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#51 Re: Help Me ! » how to get it » 2006-10-16 08:17:19

Oh yes, indeed, the rule can only be applied once. Then x can be set to 1.

#52 Re: Help Me ! » how to get it » 2006-10-16 07:23:04

It looks like you can use L'Hopital's rule twice; the denominator will be reduced to 2x, then to 2. At that point setting x = 1 in the expression will produce a finite value.

#53 Re: Help Me ! » Evaluate » 2006-10-16 03:37:53

It might probably be helpful to draw the reference triangles, and then thinking of arccos and arcsin as "the angle with the given sin or cos value", which you can read off of the reference triangle.

It's also helpful to notice that:

which is the value that is easiest to see in the 45 degree angle reference triangle.

#54 Re: Help Me ! » hello » 2006-10-13 06:34:25

Actually you could have done it using 180 also to get y, you were on the right track:

180 = 80 + 2y
100 = 2y
y = 50

#55 Re: Help Me ! » simplify.. » 2006-10-13 05:41:19

Thanks wink
Although it's arguable which of these forms is "simplest"!
For taking a derivative or integral, the final form is certainly most conveniant.

#57 Re: Help Me ! » simplify.. » 2006-10-13 05:29:42

I guess you can also say:

2sqrt(2) - sqrt(2y) -2y +ysqrt(y) = 2^(3/2) - (2y)^(1/2) - 2y + y^(3/2)

#58 Re: Help Me ! » Is there an error here? » 2006-10-13 05:16:19

I'm not sure what you mean, since this is certainly true:
d/dx (f(x))^n = n(f(x))^(n-1) f'(x)

#59 Re: Help Me ! » Is there an error here? » 2006-10-13 05:09:36

The end results all are correct as far as I can tell.

I didn't check the intermediate steps of the second part, as it seems to work out simply as:

d/dx sec^n(x) = n sec ^(n-1) * sec(x) tanx  = n sec^n(x) tanx

#60 Re: Help Me ! » solve square » 2006-10-13 05:02:31

Well, remember that 64 is a perfect square, so you can still simplify that!

#61 Re: Help Me ! » divide » 2006-10-12 06:30:09

That's what I got as well.

You can always check these like this, by making sure this equation holds:

quotient + (remainded/divisor) = (dividend/divisor)

#62 Re: Help Me ! » right? » 2006-10-12 05:29:04

unique wrote:

solved for x
2x = y - 2
x = 1/2y - 1/2

This part is not right:
2/2 = 1 not 1/2

wink

#63 Re: Help Me ! » simplify......Help » 2006-10-12 04:36:34

At the very start all I did was add 1 and 4/u to get (u + 4)/u. The steps are all simple if you do them one at a time. smile

#64 Re: Help Me ! » simplify......Help » 2006-10-12 04:25:33

I think it's like this :

In which case we work with *the most deeply nested fraction first*

And remember to divide fractions by multiplying by the reciprocal:

#65 Re: Help Me ! » LaTeX - A Crash Course » 2006-10-12 04:14:33

Thanks! That's great. Let's see:

#67 Re: Help Me ! » LaTeX - A Crash Course » 2006-10-11 13:05:21

Could you post an example of creating piecewise functions? None of the various ways I've found online for creating these seems to work here!

#68 Re: Help Me ! » divide » 2006-10-11 04:22:27

@ Devanté -- sure!

@ unique:  Yeah it's not a great explanation -- I would really prefer to have any sort of long division explained on a blackboard or something, a forum post is inadequate.
This site has nice explanations of long division of integers and decimals, but I don't think it explains polynomial long division anywhere...

#69 Re: Introductions » hi » 2006-10-11 03:34:00

Hi Payari and welcome !

#70 Re: Help Me ! » Cubics and more » 2006-10-11 03:32:40

I would assume that quartics (4th degree polynomials) can be factored in the same way, but I haven't done very much of that! You would need to find a factor (x - a), divide it into the quartic, then get a cubic as a result. Then find a factor (x - b) of the cubic by the above process, and divide again to get a quadratic! Then the quartic P(x) = (x - a)(x - b)Q(x) where Q(x) is factored in the usual way.

#71 Re: Help Me ! » divide » 2006-10-11 03:29:11

You need to use the polynomial long division process... it's hard to type that here, probably you have the procedure explained in a textbook..
If not there are sites online that explain it, for example:
http://www.sosmath.com/algebra/factor/fac01/fac01.html

#72 Re: Help Me ! » SAT Math question #20 » 2006-10-11 03:25:40

Indeed, for any closed interval of integers [a, b], the the number of integers in it is (b - a + 1). The question doesn't have the right answer listed.

#73 Re: Help Me ! » Cubics and more » 2006-10-11 03:20:08

For the cubics, you need to use the factor theorem, which states:

let P(x) be a cubic

(x - a) is a factor of P(x)   if and only if  P(a) = 0.

so for your example:

You need to try to test some values that will make this equal to 0. Let's try 1, -1, 0, 2, -2 or such.
Usually it is easy since the questions in books are designed to be smile
I usually try -2 first and look:

-8 + 8 -8 + 8 = 0 success!

Therefore, P(-2) = 0. By the factor theorem:

x -- 2 = (x + 2) is a factor of P(x)

Now you use polynomial long division, divide x + 2 into P(x).

Your result will be a quadratic factor, lets call it Q(x).

Then P(x) = (x + 2)Q(x)

and you can factor Q(x) using the standard methods.

#74 Re: Help Me ! » solving definite integrals, solving systems uisng Gaussian elimination » 2006-10-11 03:11:01

Oh I see you have almost that, but with an extra -sin(x), which shouldn't be there. smile

#75 Re: Help Me ! » solving definite integrals, solving systems uisng Gaussian elimination » 2006-10-11 03:07:29

For the integral:

Notice that

And here it just so happens that cos(x) is the derivative of sin(x).

So we get:

And now the definite integral is easy to evaluate by the fundamental theorem of calculus.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB