Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -

Login

Username

Password

Not registered yet?

Post a reply

Go back

Write your message and submit
:) :| :( :D :o ;) :/ :P :lol: :mad: :rolleyes: :cool: | :dizzy :eek :kiss :roflol :rolleyes :shame :down :up :touched :sleep :wave :swear :tongue :what :faint :dunno
Options

Go back

Topic review (newest first)

renjer
2006-05-08 00:50:01

Yes of course, using the divergence theorem is so much faster and easier too.

This is kind of complicated, but I'm getting what you're saying. How did you learn all this? Are you a maths genius? smile

Oh, and I was kind of worried that there was no answer since I have to hand in this assignment tomorrow.

Anyway, thanks for replying. It helped a lot.

Ricky
2006-05-08 00:08:55

Sorry about the delay.  If you have trouble understanding any of this, let me know.  It's hard to do a complete explanation because there are a lot of things you probably understand, and I don't want to write a book if I don't have to wink.  Ok, so we have a cube with six sides:








Now we have the normals.  I'm going to assume we want outward facing normals, although I'm not entirely sure why that fact isn't given to you.








Finally, let:





So now:



Then we have:




Not quite sure why latex doesn't format that right, but at least it's readable.

After integrating all of these, I get 760.  Is that what you get doing the divergence thm?

renjer
2006-05-07 22:33:21

Anyone knows how to solve this problem?

renjer
2006-05-06 17:57:03

Actually my lecturer told me to use a flux integral F.ndS. He talked about normal to the surface and something like that, eg the right most surface of the box has a positive j component. In that case I'd use dx and dz he says. But I still don't really understand this concept.  (by the way I can't ask him too much because this is an assignment question).

George, I tried your method, it seems like whether z=0 or z=5, it doesn't affect the equation at all because when I take the partials of x and y, the z part disappears.

George,Y
2006-05-04 00:52:31

z=0, 0<x<2, 0<y<4
z=5, 0<x<2, 0<y<4
......

renjer
2006-05-03 23:08:52

What 6 integrals do I need to set up? I know these:
a) between the x and y (limits 2,0 and 4,0)
b) between x and z (limits 2,0 and 5,0)
c) between y and z (limits 4,0 and 5,0)

What are the other 3 integrals I need to set up?

Ricky
2006-05-01 01:33:14

What you are doing is integrating over the surfaces of a block.  So you can set up 6 different integrals, each with respect to two variables, and add them all together.

Ugly, but I think it will work.

renjer
2006-04-30 18:11:35

http://static.flickr.com/49/137336996_24a300c122_o.jpg

Thanks for the prompt reply of my other question today. Here's another one.
The problem with this one is that, the surface integral formula only has 2 variables in it, x and y. But this one has another z variable (the k term).

So how do I go about doing this? (I did grad . F already before this)

And no, I can't use the divergence theorem here because I'm supposed to prove it.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB