Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

|
Options

bob bundy
2013-07-30 16:57:14

hi atran,

Real analysis starts with a set of definitions.  You'll find these at

http://ramanujan.math.trinity.edu/wtren … ALYSIS.PDF

Axiom E in the first chapter requires the existence of multiplicative inverses.

ie.  If a is a real number, then its inverse is 1/a such that

So if

Which is why I have suggested that division is the inverse operation to multiplication.

If

In words, if there are b groups each containing c objects and a objects in total then the following are equivalent:

There is also this:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=de … f+division

Bob

atran
2013-07-30 05:24:50

Hi;

I read somewhere that division can be defined as multiplying the dividend by the multiplicative inverse of the divisor: a/b = a * 1/b, but the multiplicative inverse is another division problem.

In the forum (/viewtopic.php?id=19823), I was told that partitive division could be re-written as measurement division. How is that done? I want to know why is division the inverse operation of multiplication. Is there a more formal definition?

Thanks for help.