You are not logged in.
Post a reply
Topic review (newest first)
- bobbym
- 2013-01-03 12:32:04
I am glad you are finding it at least a little helpful.
- anonimnystefy
- 2013-01-03 12:25:56
The introductory pages- 5 to 7, I think.
- bobbym
- 2013-01-03 12:00:52
Pages please, that you are talking about?
- anonimnystefy
- 2013-01-03 09:00:15
It is incredible-much of the RRA algorithm is revealed in only 3 pages!
- bobbym
- 2013-01-03 06:02:40
I hope that it will be a good book for you.
- anonimnystefy
- 2013-01-03 05:59:59
Yes, it is.
- bobbym
- 2013-01-03 05:53:28
Hi;
Is it in english? I can not tell because it is already gone!
- anonimnystefy
- 2013-01-03 05:41:37
Yes, it is.
- bobbym
- 2013-01-03 02:23:16
Hi anonimnystefy;
Is it the 2nd edition?
- anonimnystefy
- 2013-01-02 19:56:19
bobbym wrote:
Hi;
Good books are hard to find. I have used the Scheid book on numerical analysis my whole life. Except for Forman's stuff it is the best ever written.
If you hunt around you might find it online. I did, I do not know where though or if it is still there.
I would be willing to go over it as we have done with everything else. Open up a thread and ask a question and I will be there.
Did you know that when I was your age or a little younger, curve fitting ( collocation ) was the reason I got into mathematics?
I have found a book of his called Schaum's outline of theory and problems in numerical analysis. Is that the one?
- JamesW
- 2013-01-02 14:58:55
Hi;
I sent the data and detailed description of the model. Please let me know if anything is missing or ambiguous.
Many thanks!
- bobbym
- 2013-01-02 12:12:50
Hi;
I have sent you an email. I have used the email you registered with.
I am going to go eat now and may the force be with me for your question.
- JamesW
- 2013-01-02 12:04:23
Hi bobbym
I have no secret project. Please give me your eamil and I will send you the data and the equations which I used to do these fittings.
Many thanks!
- bobbym
- 2013-01-02 11:57:06
Hi James;
Here is the way I work. Slowly and step by step. Empirically coming to the solution (hopefully). That means experimentally, call me a dabbler if you like but that is what gets the cheese in numerical and computational analysis.
What does this mean to you? It means like your doctor you can not hold anything back from me. I have to know what you know. If the data you have for some reason you feel is secret then I can not assist. I need the equations you are using and hopefully the data.
I have worked on two jobs in my life that the person who hired me would not tell me what the job was for. Wished to keep everything a secret. It took ten times longer and the solution was not maximal. There is a guy in here right now who is asking me all kinds of questions about a roulette wheel. I am unable to help him any further because he is unwilling to provide the data.
I need to see and know everything about the job to have any chance of solving it. If this is impossible please let me know now.
- JamesW
- 2013-01-02 11:47:22
Yes, I wish to get fits as good as the one on the right. In most cases I get fits between these two extremes.
In both cases I used 5 Fano profiles with a quadratic background. (Please refer to Fano resonance on Wiki)