Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

Login

Username

Password

Not registered yet?

Post a reply

Go back

Write your message and submit
:) :| :( :D :o ;) :/ :P :lol: :mad: :rolleyes: :cool: | :dizzy :eek :kiss :roflol :rolleyes :shame :down :up :touched :sleep :wave :swear :tongue :what :faint :dunno
Options

Go back

Topic review (newest first)

zetafunc.
2012-10-26 03:10:09

Oh wait, I just noticed...



and since

for n ≠ 1, z ∈ Z, then every term reduces to zero, so the contour integral is zero... right?

zetafunc.
2012-10-26 03:03:37

Thanks for that, I did not know of this method. Is that the only way to show a function like this is holomorphic on C? Would I have to do this before I evaluate any contour integral?

scientia
2012-10-26 02:42:19

Let
so
where
and
.









Since the partial derivatives are continuous for all
and satisfy the Cauchy–Riemann equations
and
,
is holomorphic on the complex plane.

zetafunc.
2012-10-26 00:08:39

Why is it holomorphic on C?

scientia
2012-10-25 23:04:59

Then shouldn't it be 0 by Cauchy's integral theorem since
is holomorphic on
?

zetafunc.
2012-10-25 22:58:05

C is some simple closed curve about 0.

scientia
2012-10-25 22:50:28

What is C?

zetafunc.
2012-10-25 20:52:56

I was trying to find

, where z is complex and n is a constant.

Let z = ln(t), then dz = (1/t)dt. This transforms the integral to



Is this correct? And what would the graph of this look like?

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB