You are not logged in.
Post a reply
Topic review (newest first)
- ryos
- 2005-10-24 13:07:59
Thanks, you're a lifesaver. I had forgotten that you need at least as many equations as unknowns, and didn't think to use the derivatives.
- MathsIsFun
- 2005-10-23 19:39:12
OK, this is what I had on paper:
27a + 9b + 3c + d = -2
a + b + c + d = 0
Subtract and get: 26a + 8b + 2c = -2
Now you have 3 equations and 3 unknowns:
(1) 3a + 2b + c = 0
(2) 27a + 6b + c = 0
(3) 26a + 8b + 2c = -2
Using (1): 3a + 2b + c = 0 ==> c = -3a -2b
Combine with (2): 27a + 6b + (-3a -2b) = 0
==> 24a + 4b = 0
==> a = -(1/6)b
Substitute into (3) gets:
26a + 8b + 2c = -2
==> (-26/6)b + 8b + 2c = -2
==> (22/6)b + 2c = -2
==> c = -1 - (22/12) b
Putting all that in (1) gets:
3a + 2b + c = 0
==> 3(-1/6) b + 2b + (-1 - (22/12) b) = 0
==> (-3/6 + 2 - 22/12)b = 1
==> b = -3
Knowing b, we can calculate
a = -(1/6) b = 1/2
c = -1 - (22/12) b = 4.5
and then calculate d:
a + b + c + d = 0
0.5 + (-3) + 4.5 + -2 = 0
DONE
- MathsIsFun
- 2005-10-23 18:40:27
OK, I did it all on paper, and you do need the "d" term.
The results are:
a=1/2
b=-3
c=4.5
d=-2
I have to go now, but can do a better posting later.
- MathsIsFun
- 2005-10-23 17:14:41
3 unknowns and 4 equations ...
27a + 6b + c = 0
27a + 9b + 3c = -2
reduces to 3b+2c=-2, and then b=-2/3 - (2/3)c
a + b + c = 0
==> a = -b-c
==> a = -(-2/3 - (2/3)c)-c
==> a = 2/3 + (2/3)c - c
==> a = 2/3 - (1/3)c
3a + 2b + c = 0
==> 3(2/3 - (1/3)c) + 2(-2/3 - (2/3)c) + c = 0
==> (2 - c) + (-4/3 - (4/3)c) + c = 0
==> 2 - c -4/3 - (4/3)c + c = 0
==> 2 -4/3 - (4/3)c = 0
==> 2/3 - (4/3)c = 0
==> 2 - 4c = 0
==> 2 = 4c
==> c = 1/2
Now, I haven't made a mistake (and my mistake rate is about 10%, so it is likely 
)
b = -2/3 - (2/3)c = -2/3 - (1/3) = -1
a = 2/3 - (1/3)c = 2/3 - (1/6) = 1/2
Hmm, must have made a miscalc ... this seems odd, not working out ...
Maybe we are missing the "d" term: f(x) = ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d
I will work on it later today, ryos.
- MathsIsFun
- 2005-10-23 16:50:03
f(x) = ax^3 + bx^2 + cx
f'(x) = 3ax^2 + 2bx + c
Maxima and Minima are where slope=0, ie f'(x)=0
Where slope=0:
x=1: 3a + 2b + c = 0
x=3: 27a + 6b + c = 0
Now, we also know that f(1) = 0 and f(3) = -2:
a + b + c = 0
27a + 9b + 3c = -2
So, now it is substitution time
- ryos
- 2005-10-23 15:44:25
Find a cubic function of the form f(x) = ax^3 + bx^2 + cx which has a local maximum at f(1) = 0 and a local minimum at f(3) = -2.
I'm stumped out of my mind. I'm pretty sure that both b and c must be negative, but beyond that, no matter how I munge and funge that function, I can't get it to behave. Is there some voodoo calculus trick that I'm missing here?
(I've tried solving the coefficients as a system of equations, but that didn't work. Every time I got it down to one variable with substitutions, the variable would cancel out, leaving me with something stupid like -2=-2. But, maybe I did it wrong.)
Thanks guys.