how quickly will all chickens become extinct if they were allowed to live on their own, without being kept alive for food?
]]>we dont have right to try to save whales or to do anything other than try to live fairly. FAIRLY!
]]>We will fix our problems. We have in the past. War is not as serious (there are more conflicts, but not so intense) and the economy is far more stable. Imagine living in the Great Depression or World War II.
So far humans have "muddled through" and will hopefully continue to do so.
But at the moment we don't know what the right thing to do is ... should we Save the Whale, Reduce Greenhouse Gas, Fight Terrorism or ...what? There seem too many things to do all at once.
And Politicians only respond when they see it is a popular thing to do. So it takes a lot of effort to get change.
So, first decide what you want changed, then get behind it and push
]]>The world is corrupt anyway! Global warming is going to kill us all anyway! So we might as well enjoy it and the animals will suffer even longer if they stay alive! And the children are the ones suffering. Elder people only have to live a few more years but we have to live through the living hellish nightmare! So we might as well. As many people (including me and friends) have said,' The government is a scam and President Bush is a 'bobba'
]]>So, in conclusion; we're Humans. We're the dominant species on this planet. It's our perogative.
Exactly right, Zach! We're humans, dang it. We are better than any other species, so screw our children and our children's children, cause you know what? We're the best. And that's all that matters.
]]>So, in conclusion; we're Humans. We're the dominant species on this planet. It's our perogative.
]]>Since we're the only species on the planet intelligent enough to be able to make complex decisions about our diet, I think it all depends about on what's good for the planet. It's natural to eat other life forms for protein and fat (although there is other ways to get this, although it's quite difficult), but since we're wrecking the planet already we might want to try eating less or stop altogether - if we were still cave men and women we wouldn't be eating as much as we do now. Rearing cows for people to eat excessively already causes a lot of methane production which in turn is contributing to global warming.
Like ganesh says, it is entirely the induvidual's decision - which I think is whether they want to help the planet or not.
]]>yh but they still wouldnt get as much money. the livestock pay for much more than vergatebles and even if they had increase in crops they wont have as much money.
Can you actually back that up, or are you just saying it cause you wish for it to be true?
]]>Of course that is silly, because bulls don't speak (but do make excellent listeners).
]]>