Toast: I think it is very necessary to learn past 12x12...if anyone could learn them up to 100 it would be a lot easier!
]]>Hmm, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100, 121, 144, 169, 196, 225, 256, 289, 324, 361, 400, 441...
I think that this is a good approach. I like the fact that you said that the chart actually 'halves' itself to help you learn. I don't actually know if this is the best way, though. I learned my tables at a very young age, at that time I had never heard of this chart. But anyway, I think this is a good way.
]]>It places much more emphasis on simply remembering the tables, and says to use the "Math Trainer".
Do you believe this is a better approach?
Opinions and reviews, please
Bear in mind that hundreds of people look at this page every week.
]]>