After any series of moves, the AI evaluates the board and gives a score.
After searching and scoring like this, getting deeper and deeper, it can simply be terminated on time (10 seconds, 10 minutes, whatever) and it will then take the move that heads it in the direction of best score for it and least score for you.
So, all the AI needs to know is the rules of moves, and a way of evaluating the board position.
]]>LQ wrote:Yeah, well if your so interested, why don't you try it?
My rules will still exist on this forum, and knitted caps are as good as expensless and like only used at christmas. When it comes down to it, the only value is credit. And it is mine. And It's not worth patenting. Since it costs 2000$. Not to mention demand cost popularity curve. And my rules are cheaper to buy, cause I decide the price. And I can since I've got copyright. And surely copyright applies to every important part of my text, and there is like no way that you can reformulate that simpler. And the copyright is like appliable to all languages.Apparently you didn't understand it at all. First of all, I'm not that interrested in the game. Second of all, buying your rules wouldn't be cheaper, because I don't even have to. I could just use them, no problem. Copyright applies only to a finished product, not an idea.
Well, it is a finished product and an idea, isn't it?
]]>Yeah, well if your so interested, why don't you try it?
My rules will still exist on this forum, and knitted caps are as good as expensless and like only used at christmas. When it comes down to it, the only value is credit. And it is mine. And It's not worth patenting. Since it costs 2000$. Not to mention demand cost popularity curve. And my rules are cheaper to buy, cause I decide the price. And I can since I've got copyright. And surely copyright applies to every important part of my text, and there is like no way that you can reformulate that simpler. And the copyright is like appliable to all languages.
Apparently you didn't understand it at all. First of all, I'm not that interrested in the game. Second of all, buying your rules wouldn't be cheaper, because I don't even have to. I could just use them, no problem. Copyright applies only to a finished product, not an idea.
Say you wrote a book about kids going to a magic school ... would that infringe/violate/whatever the Harry Potter copyright?
How close could you get before you do get in trouble?
Plagiarism can be treated as an infringement of copyright, but doesn't always.
]]>Basically, you describe every move in terms of q(a)x + pos(x) + p(a)y + pos(y) where q(a)x + pos(x) and p(a)y + pos(y) ≤ 8 AND ≥ 0, and .
q = [n*,0,0;2,1,0;0,0,n;n,0,n;1,0,1;0,0,n;2,1,0;n,0,0], pos(x) = [pe1;pe2;pe3;pe4;pe5;pe6;pe7;pe8], pos(y) = [pp1;pp2;pp3;pp4;pp5;pp6;pp7;pp8],
pos(y,x) = [pe1,pp1;pe2,pp2;pe3,pp3;pe4,pp4;pe5,pp5;pe6,pp6;pe7,pp7;pe8,pp8] (the unpaseable squares in normal chess)
* where n + pe1 = pe1(2)
I will continue on this some other time. It seems simple enough.
Please reply if you find errors or want to continue.
]]>Say you wrote a book about kids going to a magic school ... would that infringe/violate/whatever the Harry Potter copyright?
How close could you get before you do get in trouble?
The answer depends on who you are, I guess
If it's the same school, characters, heroes and properties, then you're probably breaking copyright.
Unless you are harry potter... I don't know what happens then!
Sorry, the post I deleted didn't make sence.
How is that chess working out for you?
]]>Christmas doesn't end until the 5th of January.
That's the same time as my brother's birthday
]]>"I patent this computer with a knitted hat on it", "I patent my phone with a knitted hat on it". "I patent my chocolate box with a knitted hat on it"
But you can sure have copyright.
]]>How close could you get before you do get in trouble?
The answer depends on who you are, I guess
]]>Upphovsrättslagen? (use a swedish english dictionary)
It works like this: you are my friends, I play christmas chess, you play christmas chess, I came up with it and was the first to make the design, so eventually, not to say directly I get "upphovsrätt".
No need for a dictionary here, I'm Danish (It's "Opretslov" in Danish by the way, and Rod it is in fact "Copyright"). I think you've misunderstood it. It is, as you say, selfdeclaring, but it does not apply to ideas. I'll give an example: You say you've made the pieces already. Now, what the copyright does, is to ensure that I don't copy your pieces 1:1. By this I mean that I have the right to make a new game called "Taskespillet", make pieces accordingly, and then use the same rules you created.
Say you had actually produced a final game. Along with the game itself, was put a booklet with the rules. Now, I would not be allowed to copy the text itself, but it would be perfectly legal for me to write the same rules with different words.
"Okay, so if this is true, how can people make money off their products?" You might ask. Well, this is where patents come into the picture! You can actually own an idea. I'm not getting into wether I think this should be possible or not, but you can. An idea can be patented, and then you would be right. In that case I would not be able to just alter the words, since the idea would actually be more or less the same.
]]>You could presumeably make an "if click, then red color" button if that is simpler then the knitted hat. The AI will work independently. Or even simpler, extend the chess board with 32 (8*4) squares, that contains brownie equivalents. This could also be worked out neatly and is hardly impossible.
]]>