I agree, that title will decrease sales. I suggest "Simply Simple Calculus."

]]>or is this article kaboobly doo^kaboobly doo?

Yes. But then again who would buy their planned book if it was called "Yet another calculus book" ?

Bob

]]>The opinions of that book are not necessarily mine. I can not get by the paradox that a calculus book says calculus books stink.

"Analytical Geometry and Calculus" by Smail and "Calculus Made Easy" were the best I have ever seen.

]]>Def: kaboobly dooist - noun

One who does lots of kaboobly doo.

Are they kaboobly doo or just used by kaboobly dooists? Do mathematicians really use Simpson's ?

Now I ain't saying these guys are wrong or right. After all what the heck could a bumpkin like

me know about it?

http://faculty.etsu.edu/knisleyj/calculus/Crisis.htm

Are the books bad, or is this article kaboobly doo^kaboobly doo?

And most engineers will tell you that they have to "undo" much of what the calculus course does to their students.