Latex is a computer language for generating scientific documentation that is camera-ready.

I've got too many "irons in the fire" to learn new languages unless I just can't get around it.

Whenever you have too many irons in that fire just throw a few more on. You never know when you may need an extra hot iron.

At my

age I probably don't have too many good years left

Maybe you don't and maybe you do. But I am willing to bet a big bucket of wet armadillo hair ( very valuable in these parts ) that you do. You young people have got to start thinking optimistically.

]]>They have "programming languages" that allow you to write programs to explore math and

science using graphs, simulations, calculations (some quite massive) and whatever else you can

find to do with it.

Hi bobbym! Top o' the mornin' to you!

Since I'm not very "functional" but more of a "procedural" type of individual I think that perhaps

I should stick with Maple. I'm having enough trouble trying to get a bit familiar with LaTex.

I've got too many "irons in the fire" to learn new languages unless I just can't get around it. At my

age I probably don't have too many good years left so I'm wanting to make the most of them trying

to write articles about my passion (making math "user friendly") and putting them on my web site.

For many years I though that division was the only "unforgiving" operation out of +,-,*,/ in the

sense that any mistake in the calculation trashed everything following it. But this spigot approach

doesn't have that problem so one can make a mistake in one place and not affect those following

just like for +, - and *.

Thanks for the input! Have a super day today!

]]>That is pretty close to the idea. I am not aware of any built in command to

do that in either language.

Does Mathematica handle more digits than Maple?

They are both very good numerically. I do not know offhand who handles more digits.

Is its progamming language

similar to Maple?

Maple has a procedural language while Mathematica a functional one. But Mathematica has enough procedural commands to get by as a procedural clone.

]]>For the kth digit after the decimal point in the division M/N in base b: I think this works:

x:=M*b^(k-1) mod N and then y:=iquo(b*x,N) is the kth digit after the decimal in base b.

I vaguely remember finding something like this some years ago. Now I'm trying to reconstruct the

rational behind it. I think it had something to do with finding the kth digit for 1/N and then changing

it appropriately for M*(1/N).

Does Mathematica or Maple have a function to directly produce this? I'm not familiar with

Mathematica. Does Mathematica handle more digits than Maple? Is its progamming language

similar to Maple?

But I'm getting too sleepy to think straight now, so off to bed I go.

Have a good night's sleep!

]]>I use Maple, Mathematica, Derive and Geogebra for all my needs. You are correct it is a 5. There is a spigot algorithm of sorts for this.

]]>Is use Maple to do most of my novice number theory calculations. But it is limited to 268,435,448

digit numbers. So it should be able to handle little problems like what is the 260 millionth digit after

the decimal in the division (10^900+3)/(2^3000+1), eh? (I think it is a "5", but I wouldn't stake my

life on it!)

Searching on the internet, I couldn't find a spigot algorithm for these kinds of problems. Have you

had any luck finding such?

What mathematics package do you use for big number crunching?

Have a boukamendous day!

]]>There aren't spigot algorithms for every constant and some are just not known. There are spigot algorithms for the computation of cube and square roots but I do not know of one for division.

But that does not mean there is not a simple way to do that problem, I am just not sure it is a spigot algorithm.

Using the algorithm the 53 digit after the decimal is an 8.

]]>Is there a spigot algorithm for calculating a particular digit in a division problem? For example,

what is the 53rd digit of the division 117/331 without calculating all those before it?

Isn't there a multi precision oackage for C++?

]]>So that I could use the AM-GM method?]]>