You say that you do not expect me to know you, but you said that I know you.
That is not contradictory. I do not expect many things that happen to me.
Too bad we did not do several more series...
]]>But, again, you are, as always contradicting yourself. You say that you do not expect me to know you, but you said that I know you.
And what was the 16 years all about?
]]>One of them was also that when applying numerical methods we shouldn't always expect to get an answer.
Exact a mundo! That is why there is no loss of faith.
That is the main obstacle that disables me to understand you as much as I should.
There is no reason for you to understand me. We can function here without it. You do not need my age, my picture, my anything. Because of your age I am unable to explain to you why I do the things I do. Why I feel they are necessary.
]]>I remember us mentioning many differences between numerical and school book methods. One of them was also that when applying numerical methods we shouldn't always expect to get an answer.
]]>Anyway, that is the wrong answer in post #87.
]]>Second, I remember answering that question. Second part of post 87.
Third, it is interesting that you claim to know me, but it is even more interesting to claim that I know you. I have much trouble evaluating your character and personality because of all the things you hide behind. And I am not referring just to your age. I am talking about hiding behind arrays of jokes and sarcastic comments.
]]>How are they different?
I remember asking you this question.
]]>I guess it is mostly intended for use by a computer.
]]>Second, you did not read the other posts. Numerical methods are not like the math you have been taught. How are they different?
You cannot know what I feel.
This is also incorrect. For 16 years it is what I did every day. Also I have talked to you here every day for more than a year. We are not so mysterious to each other. You know me well too.
]]>It is the quoted part that contains the error now.
]]>I corrected myself about getting the number of terms in post #75.
]]>My confidence in the RRA was then shaken. But at least I tried to use it.
This is an error in judgement.
]]>