<![CDATA[Math Is Fun Forum / PSLQ and LLL?]]>2013-04-01T02:43:10ZFluxBBhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=17619<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>A simulation is not enough, you have to interpret the results correctly. He probably did something like I did.]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=337902013-04-01T02:43:10Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260200#p260200<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>That is true. I wonder where his simulation went wrong.]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=1187862013-04-01T02:37:22Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260196#p260196<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>35% is much too high just by inspection.]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=337902013-04-01T02:34:22Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260194#p260194<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>We'll have to see what he did.]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=1187862013-04-01T02:33:08Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260192#p260192<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>I think his answer is way too high.]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=337902013-04-01T02:28:11Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260188#p260188<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>Ok. So, that answer is final? Then, we have to see how Agnishom did it.]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=1187862013-04-01T02:27:32Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260187#p260187<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>Yes I know, I am still cleaning it up in my notes and I cleaned the post.]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=337902013-04-01T02:22:05Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260184#p260184<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>Your code still isn't correct. Leaving from three is #[[3]]=1 not Last[#]3!]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=1187862013-04-01T02:13:15Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260181#p260181<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>The same answer I had originally by accident. ]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=337902013-04-01T02:11:23Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260179#p260179<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>Well, there you have it. What is the new result?]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=1187862013-04-01T02:08:14Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260178#p260178<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>Hmmmm, hard to argue with that one. By golly I think you are right. I did not look at it that way.]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=337902013-04-01T02:06:21Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260177#p260177<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>That means that P(entered at 1|left at 3)=P(entered at 1 and left at 3)/P(left at 3).]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=1187862013-04-01T02:01:36Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260174#p260174<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>Yes, that is the definition.]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=337902013-04-01T01:59:52Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260171#p260171<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>And, do you agree that P(A|B)=P(A and B)/P(B)?]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=1187862013-04-01T01:57:46Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260170#p260170<![CDATA[Re: PSLQ and LLL?]]>Yes, that looks good.]]>http://www.mathisfunforum.com/profile.php?id=337902013-04-01T01:56:10Zhttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=260168#p260168