Personally, I've not seen a decline in people taking pride in their jobs, and what they do.
I have.
]]>2. I don't really agree with this. There have always been good teachers, and bad teachers. Everyone just tends to hear about the bad/angry/dysfunctional teachers more often is all. (and, hey, that's news/media for you)
At the same time, I hear about my nephew's teachers, and see how they make him more interested in school and learning, and I know there are still good teachers out there.
3. Again, I agree with this. At least where I am, I've noticed that much of the school work seems severly outdated. (not to say it's completely useless, just outdated)
4. please. There will always be people that take pride in everything that they do. There will be those that don't care about anything. And the rest of us will fall at varying places in between. Personally, I've not seen a decline in people taking pride in their jobs, and what they do. Possibly more people dissatisfied with their jobs, but that doesn't stop you from taking pride in doing the job well.
]]>Well, in my experience, the best teachers can often be the least approachable - but they are best at their job.
I can't agree. He/She might be the most knowledgeable but a teacher must be approachable.
I've always preferred to work on my own, though.
I sense it is because maybe you have done better on your own? That would reaffirm the qoute in post #1
]]>Yes, we can add that to the list.
6 Overcrowded classrooms.
]]>Here is another person, same thing:
I've always been terrible at mathematics, and would like to change that or at least give it a shot. Conventional tutors/professors never got me very far. I'm now relying on myself, and whatever useful recommendations I can find.
Learning on your own to me is quite hard because you have to be a good reader, but learning in college can be a verbal/oral and personal experience given a small enough class. I'm a bad reader, but if I concentrate, I can read alright. Learning purely on my own without textbooks is my favorite way, but then you end up learning things that no one else even heard of, like being able to count 246 matches, like Rainman, in 4 seconds.
]]>Option 1 makes most sense to me.
It would be nice if all study could be like that! But there are always some things you simply must know to do a job properly, even if they don't interest you, so *some* study can be self-motivated, but some study must be by curriculum.
]]>I am unhappy with how little mathematics I've learned since I entered college, relative to before when I was self taught
I have heard this three times in the past week. I suspect it may be more prevalent than we are being told or are willing to admit.
In my opinion these are the reasons that some students are saying this or something like it.
1) When you are studying something on your own, you are strongly motivated, as opposed to being somewhere you don't want to be. So, your results are much better.
2) The teachers (no one in here of course) are not what they used to be. I hear now on 3 forums how some teacher behaved irrationally. Years of being bullied in classrooms by students and low pay have chased many off their chosen profession.
3) Poor curriculums that do not reflect modern mathematical trends or even refusing to acknowledge those trends has left students woefully unprepared for working in industry. Example, after 20 years, half the schools here cannot decide on the calculator issue.
4) General loss of pride in any form of work, where money has become the only reason to even go to work, has drained the whole society in general.
While computational technologies are transforming the professional practice of mathematics, as yet they have had little impact on school mathematics.
5) With Andy Wiles and Sir Michael Atiyah being the most outspoken detractors it is a small wonder why the above quote is true.
What do you think?
]]>