What did you solve?
RickyIsAnIdiot
Well first the Problems with this Site!...and now my {New Code Breaking Challenge!} Thread!.
]]>Genius!...Is Waking up in the middle of the night,and solving something that was on our mind!
Just like I have with this site!?...
What did you solve?
]]>Just like I have with this site!?...
]]>is "incomprehensible jibberish" too strong of a phrase for this forum???
Nice to see you. You, better than anyone else knows that I pride myself on the comprehensibility of my jibberish.
also, bobbym seems to know quite a bit about chess and its history.
also, bobbym seems to know quite a bit about computers.
also, bobbym seems to know quite a bit about math.
Thanks for the kind sentiment. I think the keyword is seems.
]]>No, I said I am primarily a positional player.
MG
So I would expect a primarily positional player like you to do just that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The artificial intelligence community rates a computers intelligence at between a paramecium and a cricket. Hardly a genius, but they do have nice personalities.
MG
You Don,t need personality to be a Genius!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, just a matter of time, but who is the genius the programmers or the machine?
MG
As I said before Computers are made by Humans! then the Computer is on it's own and is Genius!
MathGenius#
]]>But you are a special kind of player! So I would expect you to do just that.
No, I said I am primarily a positional player.
Again they and you need your Knowledge base's updated! Computers are becoming Genius in many Scientific area's including Math Theorems! Science! Medicine! Etc.
The artificial intelligence community rates a computers intelligence at between a paramecium and a cricket. Hardly a genius, but they do have nice personalities.
At the moment they can! But again only a matter of time! The game of GO is being solved slowly by using advanced Pattern recognition techniques! Plus look up tables input by some of the worlds best players!...
Yes, just a matter of time, but who is the genius the programmers or the machine?
]]>You forgot that my German is terrible!
MG1
Sorry of course should have been obvious! The above Quotes show you know little about Chess! Computers! Math! And German!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Really now! 10^1 000 000 + thats a joke right.
MG1
I know many jokes and comedians but this one I missed...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was referring to a combination which is a sack of one or more pieces to checkmate the opponent. Positional players don't usually sack a piece unless it leads to an immediate win.
MG1
But you are a special kind of player! So I would expect you to do just that.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps some of their stuff is incorrect but much isn't. Yes, computers are made by humans. Geniuses are human, computers do not fit the definition of a genius.
MG1
Again they and you need your Knowledge base's updated! Computers are becoming Genius in many Scientific area's including Math Theorems! Science! Medicine! Etc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computers already beat the best humans: The last match 3 programs versus 3 former world champions, the final score 8 to 4 favor of the programs
MG1
Enough said!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am sorry but I am one of those people that feels that .9999999999999... = 1. Can't debate it here. Please stick to the premise of the thread.
MG1
No problem just making a point about how incompetent Wikipedia is!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also go, which has a much larger game tree then chess( ≈ 10^170 or more) has been much more difficult for computers. Alpha-beta pruning, razoring, singular extensions and all the other tricks have not been able to prune the tree to a manageable size. As far as I know the best humans can trounce the best programs.
MG1
At the moment they can! But again only a matter of time! The game of GO is being solved slowly by using advanced Pattern recognition techniques! Plus look up tables input by some of the worlds best players!...
MathGenius#
]]>is "incomprehensible jibberish" too strong of a phrase for this forum???
MathGenius#
Looks like what you have posted is to me aswell!
]]>Sorry of course should have been obvious! The above Quotes show you know little about Chess! Computers! And Math!
You forgot that my German is terrible!
Really now! 10^1 000 000 + thats a joke right.
bobbym wrote:Also I am primarily a positional player and do not sack pieces unless it leads to mate.
I would love to see an example Game of yours! What's the point in sacking a piece and then letting the Computer mate you? You might as well play on longer in hope!
I was referring to a combination which is a sack of one or more pieces to checkmate the opponent. Positional players don't usually sack a piece unless it leads to an immediate win.
As for your Quote above and from Wikipedia,it's about time they updated their knowledge base! Constantly they are putting information on their site that is wrong! For this example they and you are forgetting that Computers are made by Humans!
Another classic example is the Quote on their site that Infinite/Recurring 0.9 = 1 when the more Intellectual know!...if something is Infinite/Recurring it must stay the same continuously from how it started! i.e. 0.9 must always equal 0.9 with an Infinite/Recurring difference of 0.1 to ever becoming equal to 1
Perhaps some of their stuff is incorrect but much isn't. Yes, computers are made by humans. Geniuses are human, computers do not fit the definition of a genius.
They beat 99% of all Humans at the moment!
Computers already beat the best humans: The last match 3 programs versus 3 former world champions, the final score 8 to 4 favor of the programs
I am sorry but I am one of those people that feels that .9999999999999... = 1. Can't debate it here. Please stick to the premise of the thread.
Also go, which has a much larger game tree then chess( ≈ 10^170 or more) has been much more difficult for computers. Alpha-beta pruning, razoring, singular extensions and all the other tricks have not been able to prune the tree to a manageable size. As far as I know the best humans can trounce the best programs.
]]>MG1: 10^1,000,000+ (whoa)
also, bobbym seems to know quite a bit about chess and its history.
also, bobbym seems to know quite a bit about computers.
also, bobbym seems to know quite a bit about math.
best wishes to all,
jimmyR
Now that is one of the smartest things anyone on this forum has said to me. If you would have included math in the things I know nothing about, it would have been genius.
MG1
Sorry of course should have been obvious! The above Quotes show you know little about Chess! Computers! And Math!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is not like noughts and crosses which has a small game tree of 9!. The game tree for chess is 10^60 or larger. No conceivable computer could possibly enumerate it or store it.
MG1
10^1000,000 + will all be possible!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No one or no thing could ever play perfect chess. The alpha-beta algorithm ( an improvement on the minimax algorithm) guarantees finding a good move, no one knows what the absolute best move is.
MG1
They beat 99% of all Humans at the moment! That's pretty good for not finding the best moves so far! As I said before only a matter of time for the absolute best moves..as with when the complete Game Tree is solved!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also I am primarily a positional player and do not sack pieces unless it leads to mate.
MG1
I would love to see an example Game of yours! What's the point in sacking a piece and then letting the Computer mate you? You might as well play on longer in hope!
Wikipedia wrote:
A genius is someone who successfully applies a previously unknown technique in the production of a work of art, science, or calculation, or who masters and personalizes a known technique.etc.
As you can see from the above quote a genius is a person, never a machine.
MG1
As for your Quote above and from Wikipedia,it's about time they updated their knowledge base! Constantly they are putting information on their site that is wrong! For this example they and you are forgetting that Computers are made by Humans!
Another classic example is the Quote on their site that Infinite/Recurring 0.9 = 1 when the more Intellectual know!...if something is Infinite/Recurring it must stay the same continuously from how it started! i.e. 0.9 must always equal 0.9 with an Infinite/Recurring difference of 0.1 to ever becoming equal to 1